Regents Park Competition
| FDCE Etf | 12.60 0.00 0.00% |
Regents Park vs SBM Correlation
Moving together with Regents Etf
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Regents Park's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Regents Park Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Regents Park and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding etfs. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Regents and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Regents Park Funds does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Regents Park Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Regents Etf performing well and Regents Park ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Regents Park's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.60 | 0.02 | 0.00 | (0.36) | 2.40 | 3.43 | 13.02 | |||
| MSFT | 1.23 | (0.32) | 0.00 | (1.41) | 0.00 | 1.85 | 13.28 | |||
| UBER | 1.46 | (0.30) | 0.00 | (0.36) | 0.00 | 2.46 | 10.23 | |||
| F | 1.28 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 1.46 | 3.38 | 7.16 | |||
| T | 0.96 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 1.04 | 1.85 | 3.77 | |||
| A | 1.19 | (0.17) | 0.00 | (0.37) | 0.00 | 2.90 | 7.85 | |||
| CRM | 1.54 | (0.30) | 0.00 | (0.25) | 0.00 | 2.94 | 12.37 | |||
| JPM | 1.09 | (0.03) | (0.01) | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1.88 | 7.38 | |||
| MRK | 1.28 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 1.13 | 3.59 | 8.09 | |||
| XOM | 1.08 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 3.83 | 0.95 | 2.38 | 5.82 |
Regents Park Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Regents Park competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Regents Park's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Regents Park's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
| FDCE | FDGR | KSEA | |
| 0.00 12.60 Regents | 0.00 14.17 Regents | 0.00 27.00 KraneShares | Market Volatility (90 Days Market Risk) |
| Market Performance (90 Days Performance) | |||
| Odds of Financial Distress (Probability Of Bankruptcy) | |||
| Current Valuation (Equity Enterprise Value) | |||
| Buy or Sell Advice (Average Analysts Consensus) | |||
Trade Advice (90 Days Macroaxis Advice) | |||
| Equity Positions Weight | |||
| Three Year Return | |||
| Net Asset | |||
| Price To Book | |||
| Five Year Return | |||
| One Year Return | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | |||
| Bond Positions Weight | |||
| Ten Year Return | |||
| Beta | |||
| Price To Earning | |||
| Day Typical Price | |||
| Rate Of Daily Change | |||
| Day Median Price | |||
| Relative Strength Index | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | |||
| Mean Deviation | |||
| Jensen Alpha | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | |||
| Sortino Ratio | |||
| Downside Variance | |||
| Standard Deviation | |||
| Kurtosis | |||
| Potential Upside | |||
| Treynor Ratio | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | |||
| Variance | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | |||
| Risk Adjusted Performance | |||
| Skewness | |||
| Semi Deviation | |||
| Information Ratio | |||
| Value At Risk | |||
| Expected Short fall | |||
| Downside Deviation | |||
| Semi Variance |
Regents Park Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Regents Park Competition
Regents Park's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Regents Park Funds in relation to its competition. Regents Park's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Regents Park in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Regents Park's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Regents Park Funds, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Regents Park position
In addition to having Regents Park in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Broad Market ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Broad Market ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Broad Market ETFs theme has 106 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Broad Market ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any etf could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in unemployment. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.
Understanding Regents Park Funds requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Regents's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what Regents Park's is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Regents Park's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Regents Park's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Regents Park is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. In contrast, Regents Park's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.