GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED Competition
| GPMFX Fund | USD 7.95 -0.07 -0.87% |
GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED and Delaware National Correlation Details
Moderate diversification
Across the chosen horizon, GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED and Delaware National show a correlation of 0.28 and fall into the Moderate diversification bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED and Delaware National.
| 0.76 | AMFNX | Asg Managed Futures | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | AMFAX | Asg Managed Futures | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | ASFCX | Asg Managed Futures | PairCorr |
| 0.76 | ASFYX | Asg Managed Futures | PairCorr |
Mean reversion is the tendency of GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED's price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED's price extremes to fundamental value.
GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Guidepath Managed Futures moves relative to competing funds can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Headline performance for GUIDEPATH(R) Mutual Fund may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBHAX | 0.16 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.02 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 1.48 | |||
| CWFIX | 0.10 | -0.01 | -0.09 | -0.07 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.73 | |||
| FIHLX | 0.20 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 1.49 | |||
| VWALX | 0.15 | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 0.19 | 0.37 | 1.23 | |||
| PYMNX | 0.17 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 1.44 | |||
| PFJAX | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.95 | |||
| CXHYX | 0.18 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.15 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 1.35 |
GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED Against Peers
GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED's peer analysis compares GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Analyst consensus for GUIDEPATH(R) MANAGED shows a wider price target range than peers, reflecting higher uncertainty about its intrinsic value estimate. Comparing peers across Alternative Funds, Exotic Funds separates structural strengths from temporary momentum.
Guidepath Managed Futures metrics are compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized before display.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Gabriel Shpitalnik, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board