Hartford Quality Competition

HQGO Etf

59.55 0.51 0.86%

Hartford Quality Growth competes with REX VolMAXX, Fidelity Metaverse, Franklin FTSE, Innovator Uncapped, and Pacer Swan; as well as few others. Analyzing Hartford Quality competition allows you to expand the diversification possibilities of your existing portfolios and to get a better perspective on locking in new positions. Investors sometimes prefer comparable analysis of Hartford Quality to its intrinsic valuation because they are able to contrast its competitors on a relative basis. Check out Hartford Quality Correlation with its peers.

Hartford Quality vs Touchstone ETF Correlation

Very weak diversification

The correlation between Hartford Quality Growth and TLCI is 0.51 (i.e., Very weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hartford Quality Growth and TLCI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.

Moving together with Hartford Etf

0.71	VUG	Vanguard Growth Index	Pair Corr
0.71	IWF	iShares Russell 1000	Pair Corr
0.93	IVW	iShares SP 500	Pair Corr
0.92	SPYG	SPDR Portfolio SP	Pair Corr
0.96	IUSG	iShares Core SP	Pair Corr

Moving against Hartford Etf

0.34

FNGD

MicroSectors FANG Index

Pair Corr

Specify up to 10 symbols:

Hype

Prediction

Low	Estimated	High
58.90	59.74	60.58

Details

Intrinsic

Valuation

Low	Real	High
55.81	56.65	65.71

Details

Naive

Forecast

Low	Next	High
58.56	59.41	60.25

Details

Bollinger

Band Projection (param)

Lower	Middle Band	Upper
49.03	59.68	70.32

Details

Please note, it is not enough to conduct a financial or market analysis of a single entity such as Hartford Quality. Your research has to be compared to or analyzed against Hartford Quality's peers to derive any actionable benefits. When done correctly, Hartford Quality's competitive analysis will give you plenty of quantitative and qualitative data to validate your investment decisions or develop an entirely new strategy toward taking a position in Hartford Quality Growth.

Hartford Quality Competition Correlation Matrix

Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Hartford Quality and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding etfs. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Hartford and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Hartford Quality Growth does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.

	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM
META		-0.35	-0.4	0.4	0.13	-0.47	-0.07	0.34	0.42	0.38	META
MSFT	-0.35		0.82	-0.57	-0.71	0.74	0.85	0.07	-0.87	-0.92	MSFT
UBER	-0.4	0.82		-0.51	-0.57	0.81	0.6	-0.07	-0.8	-0.77	UBER
F	0.4	-0.57	-0.51		0.17	-0.46	-0.31	0.28	0.72	0.63	F
T	0.13	-0.71	-0.57	0.17		-0.47	-0.78	-0.15	0.5	0.63	T
A	-0.47	0.74	0.81	-0.46	-0.47		0.54	-0.01	-0.66	-0.8	A
CRM	-0.07	0.85	0.6	-0.31	-0.78	0.54		0.44	-0.64	-0.83	CRM
JPM	0.34	0.07	-0.07	0.28	-0.15	-0.01	0.44		0.2	-0.1	JPM
MRK	0.42	-0.87	-0.8	0.72	0.5	-0.66	-0.64	0.2		0.86	MRK
XOM	0.38	-0.92	-0.77	0.63	0.63	-0.8	-0.83	-0.1	0.86		XOM
	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM

Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features

High positive correlations

XOM	+ 0.86	MRK
CRM	+ 0.85	MSFT
UBER	+ 0.82	MSFT
A	+ 0.81	UBER
A	+ 0.74	MSFT
MRK	+ 0.72	F

High negative correlations

XOM	- 0.92	MSFT
MRK	- 0.87	MSFT
XOM	- 0.83	CRM
XOM	- 0.8	A
MRK	- 0.8	UBER
CRM	- 0.78	T

Hartford Quality Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Hartford Etf performing well and Hartford Quality ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Hartford Quality's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

	Mean Deviation	Jensen Alpha	Sortino Ratio	Treynor Ratio	Semi Deviation	Expected Shortfall	Potential Upside	Value @Risk	Maximum Drawdown
META	1.47	0.07	0.04	0.14	1.43	(1.78)	3.43	(2.60)	13.69
MSFT	1.33	(0.37)	0.00	(1.03)	0.00	0.00	1.90	(2.74)	13.28
UBER	1.55	(0.39)	0.00	(0.71)	0.00	0.00	2.46	(3.82)	11.09
F	1.21	0.03	0.02	0.07	1.25	(1.45)	3.34	(2.30)	7.16
T	1.01	0.14	0.10	(18.48)	0.95	(1.16)	3.87	(1.76)	5.31
A	1.27	(0.31)	0.00	(0.20)	0.00	0.00	2.90	(2.73)	7.85
CRM	1.72	(0.42)	0.00	(0.40)	0.00	0.00	2.94	(4.75)	12.37
JPM	1.26	(0.10)	0.00	(0.03)	0.00	0.00	2.34	(3.11)	7.38
MRK	1.29	0.43	0.31	0.77	0.98	(1.58)	2.93	(1.98)	8.74
XOM	1.27	0.39	0.25	1.59	1.08	(1.47)	2.90	(2.12)	6.83

Hartford Quality Competitive Analysis

The better you understand Hartford Quality competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Hartford Quality's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Hartford Quality's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.

Better Than Average

Worse Than Peers

View Performance Chart

	HQGO	VMAX	FMET	FLGR	XUSP	PSFD	PSR	PYZ	PEZ	KDEF
	0.86 59.55 Hartford	0.00 57.61 REX	0.45 33.38 Fidelity	0.14 34.84 Franklin	0.89 47.62 Innovator	0.40 37.62 Pacer	1.70 97.68 Invesco	1.42 128.83 Invesco	1.16 106.15 Invesco	0.42 57.16 Exchange
Market Volatility (90 Days Market Risk)	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady	Very steady
Market Performance (90 Days Performance)	Mild	Solid	Weakest	Solid	Fair	Good	Good	Solid	Solid	Solid
Odds of Financial Distress (Probability Of Bankruptcy)	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low
Current Valuation (Equity Enterprise Value)	Over Valued	Under Valued	Fairly Valued	Under Valued	Fairly Valued	Fairly Valued	Over Valued	Under Valued	Under Valued	Over Valued
Buy or Sell Advice (Average Analysts Consensus)	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available
Trade Advice (90 Days Macroaxis Advice)	Strong Hold	Strong Buy	Strong Sell	Strong Buy	Strong Sell	Hold	Strong Sell	Strong Buy	Hold	Cautious Hold
Price To Sales	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	6.42	1.19	1.58	N/A
Equity Positions Weight	N/A	N/A	99.71	99.92	217.23	197.97	99.99	99.82	99.58	N/A
Three Year Return	N/A	N/A	13.8	19.7	21.6	14.2	4.1	13.3	13.9	N/A
Net Asset	N/A	N/A	10.99 M	13.17 M	5.09 M	17.2 M	111.98 M	99.93 M	24.88 M	N/A
Annual Yield	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.0675
Price To Book	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	2.46	2.86	4.56	N/A
Five Year Return	N/A	N/A	N/A	9.1	N/A	11.7	4.4	11.6	1.9	N/A
One Year Return	7.9	14.6	4.5	23.1	11.7	10.4	7.7	41.6	-2.7	143.6
Last Dividend Paid	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.24	N/A	N/A	0.64	0.25	0.036	N/A
Ten Year Return	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	6.8	12.5	10.9	N/A
Beta	N/A	N/A	1.35	1.12	1.34	0.59	1.1	1.5	1.91	N/A
Price To Earning	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	29.56	18.89	20.97	N/A
Day Typical Price	59.61	57.64	33.39	34.89	47.66	37.61	97.75	129.45	105.87	56.88
Accumulation Distribution	0.68	5.27	71.9	26.86	2.25	0.19	12.26	41.68	9.04	2400.67
Market Facilitation Index	9.0E-4	0.0	1.0E-4	0.0	1.0E-4	2.0E-4	2.0E-4	6.0E-4	0.0027	0.0
Daily Balance Of Power	2.684211	N/A	0.3571	0.25	3.818182	3.75	(3.25)	0.9784	0.7578	0.2051
Period Momentum Indicator	0.51	N/A	0.15	0.05	0.42	0.15	(1.69)	1.81	1.22	0.24
Rate Of Daily Change	1.01	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.01	1.0	0.98	1.01	1.01	1.0
Day Median Price	59.65	57.66	33.39	34.91	47.68	37.6	97.78	129.76	105.74	56.75
Price Action Indicator	0.16	(0.04)	0.065	(0.04)	0.15	0.095	(0.94)	(0.02)	1.02	0.53
Relative Strength Index	60.6	60.07	60.87	65.62	59.72	67.16	42.34	71.12	38.04	73.55
Coefficient Of Variation	1165.8	738.78	(735.76)	348.55	(6,293)	592.3	682.79	371.65	1038.62	477.71
Mean Deviation	0.6371	0.7013	0.8456	0.5939	0.7493	0.2724	0.5717	1.37	0.9886	2.09
Jensen Alpha	0.0393	0.1107	(0.16)	0.1878	(0.03)	0.0473	0.103	0.4328	0.1003	0.533
Total Risk Alpha	0.0233	0.0692	(0.22)	0.1716	(0.07)	0.0388	0.0648	0.3916	0.0524	0.4001
Sortino Ratio	0.0286	0.0773	N/A	0.2278	N/A	0.0414	0.0755	0.2339	0.0742	0.2153
Downside Variance	0.811	0.9111	N/A	0.5563	N/A	0.2466	0.6904	3.51	0.9817	4.97
Standard Deviation	0.8438	0.8899	1.15	0.7549	1.03	0.3983	0.7469	1.8	1.25	2.52
Kurtosis	0.7033	0.1415	0.6706	0.1511	0.9777	3.09	(0.11)	1.22	0.0451	(0.47)
Potential Upside	1.26	1.4	1.34	1.44	1.25	0.5843	1.49	2.94	2.45	4.44
Treynor Ratio	0.0991	(16.74)	2.24	0.4041	0.8002	0.2105	(1.00)	0.412	0.4089	(1.16)
Maximum Drawdown	4.24	4.38	4.81	3.57	5.05	2.31	3.05	9.02	5.14	11.83
Variance	0.712	0.7919	1.32	0.5699	1.07	0.1586	0.5578	3.25	1.56	6.33
Market Risk Adjusted Performance	0.1091	(16.73)	2.25	0.4141	0.8102	0.2205	(0.99)	0.422	0.4189	(1.15)
Risk Adjusted Performance	0.0685	0.1082	(0.10)	0.2266	(0.01)	0.1238	0.1153	0.2186	0.0799	0.1725
Skewness	(0.31)	(0.09)	(0.43)	(0.20)	(0.45)	(0.80)	(0.24)	(0.51)	0.6156	0.144
Semi Deviation	0.8057	0.7483	N/A	0.4386	N/A	0.2893	0.6742	1.41	0.8691	1.88
Information Ratio	0.0305	0.0829	(0.18)	0.2251	(0.06)	0.0517	0.084	0.2432	0.0589	0.1908
Value At Risk	(1.38)	(1.61)	(2.56)	(0.87)	(2.11)	(0.54)	(1.27)	(1.99)	(1.78)	(3.09)
Expected Short fall	(0.69)	(0.72)	N/A	(0.71)	N/A	(0.30)	(0.56)	(1.54)	(1.24)	(2.34)
Downside Deviation	0.9006	0.9545	N/A	0.7458	N/A	0.4966	0.8309	1.87	0.9908	2.23
Semi Variance	0.6492	0.56	N/A	0.1923	N/A	0.0837	0.4545	1.98	0.7554	3.53

Hartford Quality Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Hartford Quality Competition

Hartford Quality's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Hartford Quality Growth in relation to its competition. Hartford Quality's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:

Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Hartford Quality in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Hartford Quality's competitive landscape.
Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Hartford Quality Growth, and developing a strategy to address them.
Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.

Competitive analysis is an essential tool for businesses to stay ahead of the competition and can be used to inform decision-making and strategy development. By understanding the competitive landscape and staying informed about the activities of competitors, a company can make more informed decisions and improve its overall performance.

Complement your Hartford Quality position

In addition to having Hartford Quality in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Investing Thematic Idea Now

Investing

Companies involved in money management and investment banking services. The Investing theme has 39 constituents at this time.

You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Investing Theme or any other thematic opportunities.

View All Next

Launch

When determining whether Hartford Quality Growth offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Hartford Quality's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Hartford Quality Growth Etf. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Hartford Quality Growth Etf:

How To Invest In Hartford

Details

ETF Directory

View

Largest Large Cap ETFs Companies

View

Largest Size And Style ETFs Companies

View

Check out Hartford Quality Correlation with its peers.

You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Investors evaluate Hartford Quality Growth using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Hartford Quality's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Hartford Quality's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.

Please note, there is a significant difference between Hartford Quality's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Hartford Quality is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Conversely, Hartford Quality's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2026 Macroaxis LLC

Hartford Quality Competition

Hartford Quality vs Touchstone ETF Correlation

Very weak diversification

Moving together with Hartford Etf

Moving against Hartford Etf

Specify up to 10 symbols:

Hartford Quality Competition Correlation Matrix

High positive correlations

High negative correlations

Hartford Quality Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Hartford Quality Competitive Analysis

Hartford Quality Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Hartford Quality Competition

Complement your Hartford Quality position

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Investing Thematic Idea Now

Investing

COMMON DESTINATIONS

MAIN CATEGORIES

COMPANY