IShares Equity Competition
| LRGF ETF | USD 73.75 0.01 0.01% |
IShares Equity and VanEck UraniumNuclear Correlation Snapshot
Poor diversification
IShares Equity currently posts a 0.68 correlation with VanEck UraniumNuclear, indicating a Poor diversification relationship for the active sample. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
| 1.0 | VTI | Vanguard Total Stock | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | SPY | SPDR SAMPP 500 | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | IVV | iShares Core SAMPP | PairCorr |
| 0.87 | VIG | Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
| 1.0 | VV | Vanguard Large Cap Index | PairCorr |
Mean reversion is the tendency of IShares Equity's price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing IShares Equity's price extremes to fundamental value.
IShares Equity Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for iShares Equity Factor matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
IShares Equity Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Headline performance for IShares Equity ETF may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTF | 0.99 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2.35 | 5.47 | |||
| IYH | 0.73 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 3.73 | |||
| EWU | 0.99 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 5.70 | |||
| IFRA | 0.81 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 1.96 | 5.55 | |||
| IWX | 0.60 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.65 | 1.41 | 3.32 | |||
| XME | 1.83 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.76 | 3.78 | 11.63 | |||
| IMCG | 0.99 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 1.12 | 2.34 | 5.59 | |||
| USRT | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 1.51 | 4.70 | |||
| ITB | 1.42 | -0.22 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 3.51 | 8.96 | |||
| NLR | 2.23 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2.76 | 5.49 | 12.09 |
IShares Equity Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IShares Equity Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IShares Equity Against Peers
IShares Equity's peer analysis compares IShares Equity with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IShares Equity trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IShares Equity leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
IShares Equity carries less net debt relative to EBITDA than most competitors, giving it more room to invest or weather downturns. Comparing peers across Broad Equity ETFs, Strategy ETFs separates structural strengths from temporary momentum.
iShares Equity Factor metrics are compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized before display.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board