JPMorgan Fundamental Competition
| MCDS Etf | 59.92 0.49 0.81% |
JPMorgan Fundamental vs First Trust Correlation
Very poor diversification
The correlation between JPMorgan Fundamental Data and RFEU is 0.81 (i.e., Very poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding JPMorgan Fundamental Data and RFEU in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with JPMorgan Etf
| 0.97 | VO | Vanguard Mid Cap | PairCorr |
| 0.95 | VXF | Vanguard Extended Market | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | IJH | iShares Core SP | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | IWR | iShares Russell Mid | PairCorr |
| 0.99 | MDY | SPDR SP MIDCAP | PairCorr |
Moving against JPMorgan Etf
| 0.7 | SWIN | Alps Symbol Change | PairCorr |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of JPMorgan Fundamental's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
JPMorgan Fundamental Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between JPMorgan Fundamental and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding etfs. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of JPMorgan and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of JPMorgan Fundamental Data does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
JPMorgan Fundamental Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between JPMorgan Etf performing well and JPMorgan Fundamental ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze JPMorgan Fundamental's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCDS | 0.80 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.94 | 1.77 | 4.82 | |||
| EAOM | 0.26 | 0.02 | (0.07) | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.56 | 1.57 | |||
| LQAI | 0.74 | (0.07) | 0.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 1.30 | 5.26 | |||
| ESIX | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.84 | 1.93 | 5.10 | |||
| NSCR | 0.59 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.83 | 1.31 | 3.84 | |||
| UGE | 1.17 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 1.25 | 2.53 | 6.54 | |||
| ESMV | 0.51 | (0.03) | (0.06) | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 7.02 | |||
| DAT | 1.16 | (0.24) | 0.00 | (0.72) | 0.00 | 2.00 | 5.92 | |||
| INDH | 0.45 | (0.05) | 0.00 | (0.09) | 0.00 | 0.90 | 2.55 | |||
| RFEU | 0.41 | 0.08 | 0.05 | (1.10) | 0.32 | 0.94 | 2.44 |
JPMorgan Fundamental Competitive Analysis
The better you understand JPMorgan Fundamental competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, JPMorgan Fundamental's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across JPMorgan Fundamental's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
JPMorgan Fundamental Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of JPMorgan Fundamental Competition
JPMorgan Fundamental's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by JPMorgan Fundamental Data in relation to its competition. JPMorgan Fundamental's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of JPMorgan Fundamental in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact JPMorgan Fundamental's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to JPMorgan Fundamental Data, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your JPMorgan Fundamental position
In addition to having JPMorgan Fundamental in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run FinTech Thematic Idea Now
FinTech
High long term potential financial entities that are ranging from payment processing, investment management to commercial and investment banking. The FinTech theme has 67 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize FinTech Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out JPMorgan Fundamental Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Understanding JPMorgan Fundamental Data requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects JPMorgan's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what JPMorgan Fundamental's is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push JPMorgan Fundamental's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Understanding that JPMorgan Fundamental's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether JPMorgan Fundamental represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. In contrast, JPMorgan Fundamental's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.