Infrared Competitors

Stocks . USA . 
Stock . Infrared Cameras Holdings
MSAIW Stock   0.04  0  4.55%   
Infrared Cameras Holdings competes with Helport AI, Hub Cyber, AtlasClear Holdings, Apptech Corp, and Future Fintech; as well as few others. The company classifies itself under Building Products sector and is part of Industrials industry. Analyzing Infrared Cameras competition allows you to expand the diversification possibilities of your existing portfolios and to get a better perspective on locking in new positions. Investors sometimes prefer comparable analysis of Infrared Cameras to its intrinsic valuation because they are able to contrast its competitors on a relative basis. Check out Infrared Cameras Correlation with its peers.

Infrared Cameras vs Global Interactive Correlation

Good diversification

The correlation between Infrared Cameras Holdings and GITS is -0.13 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Infrared Cameras Holdings and GITS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.

Moving against Infrared Stock

  0.8352SA SYSTEMAIR ABPairCorr
  0.78GWA GWA Group Earnings Call This WeekPairCorr
  0.78NXR Norcros PlcPairCorr
  0.62BEAN Belimo HoldingPairCorr
  0.6IIIN Insteel IndustriesPairCorr
Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -1.68 in 2026. Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -1.83 in 2026. At this time, Infrared Cameras' Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to climb to about 1 M in 2026, whereas Other Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 362.5 K in 2026.
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.000.0417.18
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.000.0417.18
Details

Infrared Cameras Competition Correlation Matrix

Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Infrared Cameras and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Infrared and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Infrared Cameras Holdings does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.

High positive correlations

CYCU
+ 0.88
FTFT
FTFT
+ 0.87
HUBC
CYCU
+ 0.85
HUBC
FTFT
+ 0.83
ATCH
RVYL
+ 0.82
HUBC
RVYL
+ 0.82
FTFT
  

High negative correlations

GITS
- 0.7
HPAI
GITS
- 0.58
FTFT
GITS
- 0.46
CYCU
GITS
- 0.41
ATCH
GITS
- 0.37
HUBC
APCX
- 0.32
HPAI

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Infrared Stock performing well and Infrared Cameras Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Infrared Cameras' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.
Mean DeviationJensen AlphaSortino RatioTreynor RatioSemi DeviationExpected ShortfallPotential UpsideValue @RiskMaximum Drawdown
HPAI  2.82  0.42  0.08 (1.21) 3.60 
(3.09)
 6.85 
(5.48)
 23.89 
HUBC  7.43 (2.70) 0.00 (3.25) 0.00 
 0.00 
 8.91 
(17.81)
 90.82 
ATCH  3.42 (0.47) 0.00 (0.14) 0.00 
 0.00 
 7.69 
(8.33)
 22.00 
APCX  4.90 (0.28) 0.00 (0.12) 0.00 
 0.00 
 14.29 
(9.09)
 37.41 
FTFT  4.81 (2.15) 0.00 (0.51) 0.00 
 0.00 
 8.18 
(12.18)
 25.64 
QCLS  7.42  0.90  0.14  0.68  6.16 
(10.85)
 13.54 
(11.13)
 63.27 
CYCU  4.80 (1.92) 0.00 (0.72) 0.00 
 0.00 
 10.14 
(11.23)
 31.34 
RVYL  6.90 (0.63) 0.00 (0.31) 0.00 
 0.00 
 15.98 
(10.91)
 35.58 
BNZI  6.90  0.10  0.01  0.15  7.59 
(7.99)
 15.97 
(11.64)
 48.98 
GITS  9.83  2.05  0.16  5.19  9.94 
(11.86)
 15.29 
(23.74)
 144.00 

Infrared Cameras Competitive Analysis

The better you understand Infrared Cameras competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Infrared Cameras' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Infrared Cameras' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
MSAIW HPAI HUBC ATCH APCX FTFT QCLS CYCU RVYL BNZI
 4.55 
 0.04 
Infrared
 9.09 
 3.12 
Helport
 5.00 
 2.28 
Hub
 7.69 
 0.24 
AtlasClear
 2.56 
 0.38 
Apptech
 6.29 
 1.49 
Future
 1.26 
 3.92 
QCLS
 2.69 
 1.81 
Cycurion
 7.17 
 5.96 
Ryvyl
 1.61 
 1.26 
Banzai
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Out of control
Risky
Extremely Dangerous
Out of control
Out of control
Extremely Dangerous
Dangerous
Extremely Dangerous
Very risky
Very risky
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Weakest
Fair
Weakest
Weakest
Weakest
Weakest
Fair
Weakest
Weakest
Weak
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Risky
Low
Risky
Strong
High
Risky
Strong
High
Risky
Risky
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Over Valued
Over Valued
Fairly Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Over Valued
Under Valued
Buy or Sell Advice
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
Cautious Hold
Strong Sell
Strong Sell
Cautious Hold
Cautious Hold
Strong Sell
Cautious Hold
Cautious Hold
Current Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.23
1.85
9.53
N/A
N/A
2.51
N/A
Net Asset
15.48 M
37.18 M
27.42 M
60.89 B
8.99 M
25.9 M
21.42 M
25.56 M
122.28 M
25.67 M
Profit Margin
-2.23
0.0533
-1.88
-0.44
N/A
N/A
N/A
-1.11
-0.47
-2.38
EBITDA
(20.76 M)
7.14 M
(23.63 M)
1.03 M
(6.86 M)
(33.86 M)
(8.66 M)
2.47 M
(20.3 M)
(28.3 M)
Operating Margin
-1.08
0.0193
-1.26
-0.12
-12.24
-1.09
N/A
-1.18
-0.73
-1.56
Current Valuation
N/A
111.53 M
55.43 M
41.76 M
6.56 M
(26.5 M)
N/A
13.58 M
10.66 M
30.28 M
Price To Book
N/A
6.26
3.71
5.38
1.87
0.2
N/A
0.42
0.99
3.07
Retained Earnings
(54.63 M)
14.9 M
(226.25 M)
(142.52 B)
(168.7 M)
(218.89 M)
(129.14 M)
(3.2 M)
(179.41 M)
(78.28 M)
Current Asset
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.53 M
41 K
59.98 M
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Beta
-0.11
-0.29
-1.08
0.63
0.4
1.61
N/A
0.81
2.8
-0.56
Number Of Employees
41
314
322
7
9
36
2
46
95
28
Shares Outstanding
N/A
37.43 M
2.18 M
144.58 M
33.28 M
5.05 M
N/A
4.19 M
31.77 M
13.3 M
Cash Flow From Operations
(15.57 M)
N/A
(17.11 M)
1.57 M
(7.46 M)
(11.14 M)
(8.98 M)
(1.37 M)
21.19 M
(9.58 M)
Total Debt
310 K
2.38 M
40.48 M
1 B
147 K
1.08 M
10.58 K
10.22 M
21.07 M
12.5 M
Return On Equity
-1.04
0.12
-15.01
N/A
-2.2
-1.44
N/A
-1.62
-20.98
N/A
Return On Asset
-0.51
0.0534
-0.36
-0.0109
-0.76
-0.41
N/A
-0.13
-0.0684
-0.56
Number Of Shares Shorted
53.25 K
22.13 K
172.6 K
11.99 M
188.1 K
73.06 K
N/A
312.64 K
143.48 K
1.12 M
Book Value Per Share
0.24
0.47
-84.67
0.054
0.11
8.61
N/A
7.11
-0.43
1.05
Current Liabilities
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.87 M
4.51 M
34.02 M
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Asset
15.48 M
37.18 M
27.42 M
60.89 B
8.99 M
25.9 M
21.42 M
25.56 M
122.28 M
25.67 M
Short Ratio
N/A
2.94
0.62
2.89
0.98
2.04
N/A
2.17
0.1
0.87
Debt To Equity
N/A
N/A
N/A
83.2
0.18
0.002
N/A
N/A
1.76
N/A
Target Price
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.5
4.0
N/A
7.0
2.75
14.0
Shares Owned By Institutions
N/A
2.6
0.26
6.99
3.81
0.69
N/A
2.65
6.34
2.33
Market Capitalization
N/A
109.3 M
5.09 M
34.7 M
6.85 M
8.53 M
N/A
8.13 M
10.33 M
16.78 M
Price To Earning
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-0.76
0.14
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Price To Sales
N/A
3.14
0.18
2.82
17.65
3.2
N/A
0.52
0.16
1.58
Net Income
(21.5 M)
N/A
(39.03 M)
5.75 M
(8.93 M)
(34.2 M)
(23.36 M)
1.23 M
(26.82 M)
(31.51 M)
Earnings Per Share
N/A
0.05
-86.09
-40.97
-0.3
-80.52
N/A
-6.5
-2.02
-64.42
Shares Owned By Insiders
N/A
78.94
0.62
0.6
14.69
57.64
N/A
10.75
22.55
2.45
Revenue
7.4 M
34.86 M
29.56 M
10.86 M
276 K
2.16 M
N/A
17.77 M
56 M
4.53 M
Working Capital
7.5 M
4.68 M
(87.67 M)
43.41 M
(1.02 M)
7.6 M
2.71 M
(7.81 M)
(8.16 M)
(25.59 M)
Cash And Equivalents
N/A
N/A
N/A
305.34 K
7.79 M
43.29 M
N/A
N/A
11.02 M
N/A
Cash Per Share
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.01
0.47
0.59
N/A
N/A
0.23
N/A
Gross Profit
3.1 M
19.12 M
4.83 M
10.23 M
219 K
503.97 K
N/A
2.73 M
19.73 M
8.6 M
Day Typical Price
0.0399
3.13
2.28
0.24
0.39
1.49
3.88
1.81
6.04
1.24
Accumulation Distribution
N/A
1321.56
15955.26
1.1 M
563.41
1901.25
13662.81
7170.79
1564.0
0.0703
Market Facilitation Index
N/A
1.0E-4
0.0
N/A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.09
Daily Balance Of Power
0
0.5
(0.43)
(1.00)
(0.33)
(0.62)
(0.22)
(0.25)
(0.68)
0.2222
Period Momentum Indicator
(0)
0.26
(0.12)
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.10)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.46)
0.02
Rate Of Daily Change
0.95
1.09
0.95
0.92
0.97
0.94
0.99
0.97
0.93
1.02
Day Median Price
0.0399
3.14
2.28
0.24
0.4
1.49
3.87
1.81
6.08
1.23
Price Action Indicator
(0.0009)
0.11
(0.06)
(0.01)
(0.02)
(0.05)
0.03
(0.03)
(0.35)
0.035
Coefficient Of Variation
(2,243)
991.8
(441.36)
(1,547)
(5,002)
(347.12)
1123.8
(408.12)
(1,816)
4714.72
Mean Deviation
11.26
2.82
7.43
3.42
4.9
4.81
7.42
4.8
6.9
6.9
Jensen Alpha
(0.60)
0.4162
(2.70)
(0.47)
(0.28)
(2.15)
0.9048
(1.92)
(0.63)
0.0982
Total Risk Alpha
(2.20)
0.0449
(3.66)
(0.73)
(0.87)
(2.45)
0.0115
(2.37)
(1.30)
(0.61)
Sortino Ratio
N/A
0.0773
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1443
N/A
N/A
0.014
Downside Variance
N/A
17.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
42.36
N/A
N/A
65.75
Standard Deviation
16.59
4.0
11.64
4.76
8.06
6.51
11.46
7.1
9.09
9.16
Kurtosis
3.24
1.45
10.5
0.1553
7.35
1.71
6.81
3.35
1.67
1.28
Potential Upside
30.58
6.85
8.91
7.69
14.29
8.18
13.54
10.14
15.98
15.97
Treynor Ratio
0.3531
(1.21)
(3.25)
(0.14)
(0.12)
(0.51)
0.6801
(0.72)
(0.31)
0.1514
Maximum Drawdown
73.89
23.89
90.82
22.0
37.41
25.64
63.27
31.34
35.58
48.98
Variance
275.35
16.0
135.46
22.62
64.98
42.42
131.35
50.46
82.66
83.9
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
0.3631
(1.20)
(3.24)
(0.13)
(0.11)
(0.50)
0.6901
(0.71)
(0.30)
0.1614
Risk Adjusted Performance
(0.03)
0.0899
(0.17)
(0.04)
(0.01)
(0.23)
0.0816
(0.19)
(0.04)
0.0263
Skewness
1.2
0.0685
1.66
0.1806
(1.14)
0.2284
2.31
(0.30)
1.18
0.8302
Semi Deviation
N/A
3.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.16
N/A
N/A
7.59
Information Ratio
(0.05)
0.0806
(0.23)
(0.08)
(0.03)
(0.30)
0.0819
(0.26)
(0.06)
0.0124
Value At Risk
(23.53)
(5.48)
(17.81)
(8.33)
(9.09)
(12.18)
(11.13)
(11.23)
(10.91)
(11.64)
Expected Short fall
N/A
(3.09)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(10.85)
N/A
N/A
(7.99)
Downside Deviation
N/A
4.17
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.51
N/A
N/A
8.11
Semi Variance
N/A
12.93
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
37.98
N/A
N/A
57.58

Infrared Cameras Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Infrared Cameras Competition

Infrared Cameras' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Infrared Cameras Holdings in relation to its competition. Infrared Cameras' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:
  • Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Infrared Cameras in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
  • Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
  • Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Infrared Cameras' competitive landscape.
  • Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Infrared Cameras Holdings, and developing a strategy to address them.
  • Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Competitive analysis is an essential tool for businesses to stay ahead of the competition and can be used to inform decision-making and strategy development. By understanding the competitive landscape and staying informed about the activities of competitors, a company can make more informed decisions and improve its overall performance.

Complement your Infrared Cameras position

In addition to having Infrared Cameras in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Driverless Cars Thematic Idea Now

Driverless Cars
Driverless Cars Theme
It encompasses large technology companies, automotive makers, security firms, and thematic ETFs across multiple industries. These entities are directly or indirectly involved in shaping the development and marketing of self-driving vehicles. The Driverless Cars theme has 36 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Driverless Cars Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Additional Tools for Infrared Stock Analysis

When running Infrared Cameras' price analysis, check to measure Infrared Cameras' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Infrared Cameras is operating at the current time. Most of Infrared Cameras' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Infrared Cameras' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Infrared Cameras' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Infrared Cameras to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions
 
Feedback Blog
Made with optimal in San Francisco
2026 Macroaxis LLC
COMMON DESTINATIONS
MAIN CATEGORIES
COMPANY