Restaurant Competitors

RSTRFDelisted Stock  USD 70.08  0.00  0.00%   
Restaurant Brands competes with Yum Brands, Shake Shack, Papa Johns, Dominos Pizza, and Jack In; as well as few others. The company classifies itself under Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and is part of Consumer Discretionary industry. Analyzing Restaurant Brands competition allows you to expand the diversification possibilities of your existing portfolios and to get a better perspective on locking in new positions. Investors sometimes prefer comparable analysis of Restaurant Brands to its intrinsic valuation because they are able to contrast its competitors on a relative basis. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area.
You can use the Comparative Equity Analysis module to analyze the advantages of investing in your portfolio's related equities across multiple sectors and thematic ideas. Please use the input box below to enter symbols for particular investments you would like to analyze. With the equity comparison module, you can estimate the relative effect of Restaurant Brands competition on your existing holdings.
  
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
69.9970.0870.17
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
59.5459.6377.09
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
68.3168.4068.49
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
69.7169.8770.04
Details

Restaurant Brands Competition Correlation Matrix

Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Restaurant Brands and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding pink sheets. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Restaurant and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Restaurant Brands does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
Click cells to compare fundamentals   Check Volatility   Backtest Portfolio
High positive correlations   
CAKESHAK
CAKEDPZ
CBRLCAKE
DPZSHAK
CBRLSHAK
DRIDPZ
  
High negative correlations   
WINGCAKE
WINGSHAK
WINGJACK
CBRLWING
WINGDPZ
WINGPZZA

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Restaurant Pink Sheet performing well and Restaurant Brands Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Restaurant Brands' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.
Mean DeviationJensen AlphaSortino RatioTreynor RatioSemi DeviationExpected ShortfallPotential UpsideValue @RiskMaximum Drawdown
YUM  0.79 (0.01)(0.08) 0.09  0.90 
 1.48 
 6.05 
SHAK  1.77  0.19  0.12  0.28  1.50 
 5.02 
 11.94 
PZZA  1.98 (0.06)(0.03) 0.06  2.40 
 4.11 
 10.07 
DPZ  1.19  0.04  0.04  0.16  1.19 
 3.26 
 7.92 
JACK  2.21 (0.22) 0.00 (0.20) 0.00 
 4.33 
 11.59 
CAKE  1.75  0.17  0.10  0.26  1.63 
 4.75 
 13.08 
DRI  1.16  0.01  0.05  0.13  0.96 
 2.04 
 11.46 
WING  1.98 (0.38) 0.00 (0.15) 0.00 
 3.59 
 25.52 
CBRL  2.53  0.42  0.11 (6.13) 2.36 
 6.19 
 13.37 
CMG  1.29  0.10  0.04  0.22  2.02 
 2.74 
 10.78 

Restaurant Brands Competitive Analysis

The better you understand Restaurant Brands competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Restaurant Brands' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Restaurant Brands' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
RSTRF YUM SHAK PZZA DPZ JACK CAKE DRI WING CBRL
 0.00 
 70.08 
Restaurant
 0.50 
 139.33 
Yum
 0.20 
 132.35 
Shake
 1.06 
 49.76 
Papa
 0.12 
 472.34 
Dominos
 0.60 
 46.87 
Jack
 1.82 
 49.74 
Cheesecake
 0.65 
 174.98 
Darden
 2.22 
 331.27 
Wingstop
 1.56 
 52.76 
Cracker
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Advice
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Five Year Return
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Number Of Shares Shorted
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Last Dividend Paid
Short Ratio
Target Price
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Restaurant Brands Competition Performance Charts

Five steps to successful analysis of Restaurant Brands Competition

Restaurant Brands' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Restaurant Brands in relation to its competition. Restaurant Brands' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:
  • Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Restaurant Brands in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
  • Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
  • Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' competitive landscape.
  • Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Restaurant Brands, and developing a strategy to address them.
  • Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Competitive analysis is an essential tool for businesses to stay ahead of the competition and can be used to inform decision-making and strategy development. By understanding the competitive landscape and staying informed about the activities of competitors, a company can make more informed decisions and improve its overall performance.

Complement your Restaurant Brands position

In addition to having Restaurant Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Consumer Funds Thematic Idea Now

Consumer Funds
Consumer Funds Theme
Funds or Etfs that invest in consumer products such as packaged goods, clothing, food, beverages and retail services. The Consumer Funds theme has 40 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Consumer Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area.
You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Consideration for investing in Restaurant Pink Sheet

If you are still planning to invest in Restaurant Brands check if it may still be traded through OTC markets such as Pink Sheets or OTC Bulletin Board. You may also purchase it directly from the company, but this is not always possible and may require contacting the company directly. Please note that delisted stocks are often considered to be more risky investments, as they are no longer subject to the same regulatory and reporting requirements as listed stocks. Therefore, it is essential to carefully research the Restaurant Brands' history and understand the potential risks before investing.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities