Simplify Equity Competition
| SPUC ETF | USD 48.98 0.54 1.11% |
Correlation: Simplify Equity vs AIM ETF Summary
Minimal diversification benefit
Across the chosen horizon, Simplify Equity and AIM ETF show a correlation of 0.94 and fall into the Minimal diversification benefit bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between Simplify Equity and AIM ETF.
While mean reversion in Simplify Equity is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Mean reversion signals in Simplify Equity's arise when prices disconnect from earnings, book value, or historical multiples. Mean reversion in Simplify Equity is more reliable over longer time horizons than shorter ones. In highly covered equities like Simplify Equity, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Simplify Equity Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Simplify Equity PLUS and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Simplify Equity Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Simplify Equity ETF can look attractive on recent price action while risk efficiency lags the peer group. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 1.73 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 15.22 | |||
| MSFT | 1.35 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 1.74 | 3.11 | 8.57 | |||
| UBER | 1.72 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 2.20 | 3.61 | 8.83 | |||
| F | 1.53 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.12 | 0.00 | 4.11 | 9.26 | |||
| T | 1.17 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 7.75 | |||
| A | 1.41 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 8.08 | |||
| CRM | 2.07 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 13.46 | |||
| JPM | 1.12 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 8.16 | |||
| MRK | 1.18 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.14 | 1.57 | 2.73 | 7.67 | |||
| XOM | 1.42 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.07 | 2.04 | 2.68 | 8.59 |
Simplify Equity Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Simplify Equity Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Simplify Equity Against Peers
Simplify Equity's peer analysis compares Simplify Equity with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Simplify Equity trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Simplify Equity leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Simplify Equity generates higher gross margins than most of its direct competitors, which points to pricing power or a leaner cost base. Sector and peer comparisons can improve selection when multiple related names appear investable.
Simplify Equity PLUS data is compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors