CI Lawrence Correlations

CRED Etf

CAD 20.27 0.05 0.25%

The current 90-days correlation between CI Lawrence Park and Brompton Global Dividend is 0.15 (i.e., Average diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as CI Lawrence moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if CI Lawrence Park moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.

CI Lawrence Correlation With Market

Significant diversification

The correlation between CI Lawrence Park and DJI is 0.01 (i.e., Significant diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CI Lawrence Park and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.

The ability to find closely correlated positions to CI Lawrence could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace CI Lawrence when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back CI Lawrence - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling CI Lawrence Park to buy it.

Moving together with CRED Etf

0.93	XIU	iShares SPTSX 60	Pair Corr
0.87	XSP	iShares Core SP	Pair Corr
0.92	XIC	iShares Core SPTSX	Pair Corr
0.92	ZCN	BMO SPTSX Capped	Pair Corr
0.89	ZSP	BMO SP 500	Pair Corr
0.89	VFV	Vanguard SP 500	Pair Corr
0.95	ZEB	BMO SPTSX Equal	Pair Corr
0.93	XFR	iShares Floating Rate	Pair Corr

Moving against CRED Etf

0.45

TCLB

TD Canadian Long

Pair Corr

Related Correlations Analysis

	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM
META		0.26	0.55	0.07	0.53	0.05	0.64	0.28	-0.53	0.73	META
MSFT	0.26		0.21	0.17	0.16	-0.01	0.03	-0.11	0.13	-0.2	MSFT
UBER	0.55	0.21		-0.06	-0.09	0.27	-0.03	-0.16	0.09	0.35	UBER
F	0.07	0.17	-0.06		0.28	-0.41	0.5	0.7	-0.37	0.32	F
T	0.53	0.16	-0.09	0.28		-0.5	0.81	0.64	-0.79	0.39	T
A	0.05	-0.01	0.27	-0.41	-0.5		-0.46	-0.6	0.63	0.0	A
CRM	0.64	0.03	-0.03	0.5	0.81	-0.46		0.86	-0.91	0.65	CRM
JPM	0.28	-0.11	-0.16	0.7	0.64	-0.6	0.86		-0.83	0.47	JPM
MRK	-0.53	0.13	0.09	-0.37	-0.79	0.63	-0.91	-0.83		-0.56	MRK
XOM	0.73	-0.2	0.35	0.32	0.39	0.0	0.65	0.47	-0.56		XOM
	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM

Click cells to compare fundamentals

Check Volatility

Backtest Portfolio

Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features

Correlation Matchups

Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.

High positive correlations

JPM	+ 0.86	CRM
CRM	+ 0.81	T
XOM	+ 0.73	META
JPM	+ 0.7	F
XOM	+ 0.65	CRM
CRM	+ 0.64	META

High negative correlations

MRK	- 0.91	CRM
MRK	- 0.83	JPM
MRK	- 0.79	T
JPM	- 0.6	A
XOM	- 0.56	MRK
MRK	- 0.53	META

CI Lawrence Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between CRED Etf performing well and CI Lawrence ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze CI Lawrence's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

	Mean Deviation	Jensen Alpha	Sortino Ratio	Treynor Ratio	Semi Deviation	Expected Shortfall	Potential Upside	Value @Risk	Maximum Drawdown
META	1.07	0.07	0.02	0.23	1.41	(1.14)	2.62	(3.15)	8.02
MSFT	0.90	(0.04)	(0.05)	0.07	1.50	(0.86)	2.09	(1.85)	8.19
UBER	1.61	(0.11)	(0.04)	0.02	2.32	(1.70)	2.69	(2.53)	20.10
F	1.42	(0.15)	(0.04)	0.03	2.23	(1.39)	2.53	(2.90)	11.21
T	0.92	0.26	0.12	(7.83)	0.86	(1.06)	2.56	(1.72)	6.47
A	1.17	(0.09)	0.00	(0.06)	0.00	0.00	2.71	(2.42)	9.02
CRM	1.31	0.23	0.18	0.34	1.08	(1.53)	3.18	(1.91)	9.98
JPM	1.12	(0.04)	0.05	0.11	1.38	(1.23)	2.05	(2.00)	15.87
MRK	0.91	(0.24)	0.00	(0.86)	0.00	0.00	2.00	(2.13)	4.89
XOM	1.00	(0.03)	(0.07)	0.06	1.31	(1.04)	2.10	(2.09)	5.74

Be your own money manager

Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in CI Lawrence without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.

Did you try this?

Run Balance Of Power Now

Balance Of Power

Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios

All Next

Launch Module

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2024 Macroaxis LLC