Logistics Development Correlations
| ESLGF Stock | USD 0.23 0.00 0.00% |
The current 90-days correlation between Logistics Development and Harbor Diversified is -0.03 (i.e., Good diversification). The correlation of Logistics Development is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Logistics Development Correlation With Market
Good diversification
The correlation between Logistics Development Group and DJI is -0.09 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Logistics Development Group and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Logistics |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Logistics Development could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Logistics Development when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Logistics Development - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Logistics Development Group to buy it.
Moving together with Logistics Pink Sheet
| 0.91 | UPS | United Parcel Service | PairCorr |
| 0.92 | FDX | FedEx | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | DPSTF | Deutsche Post AG | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | DSDVF | DSV Panalpina AS | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | DSDVY | DSV Panalpina AS | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | EXPD | Expeditors International | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | MMSI | Merit Medical Systems | PairCorr |
| 0.75 | THS | Treehouse Foods | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | TLSI | TriSalus Life Sciences | PairCorr |
| 0.96 | GOOGL | Alphabet Class A Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.72 | 907818EN4 | UNION PAC P | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | ISUZY | Isuzu Motors | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | PLTK | Playtika Holding Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | DHC | Diversified Healthcare | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | SGML | Sigma Lithium Resources | PairCorr |
Moving against Logistics Pink Sheet
| 0.73 | GOOD | Gladstone Commercial | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | SFHOY | SF Holding | PairCorr |
| 0.5 | KNTK | Kinetik Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | ABVE | Above Food Ingredients | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | GTVH | Golden Triangle Ventures | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | 87264ACQ6 | TMUS 27 15 | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | GDDFF | Goodfood Market Corp | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Logistics Pink Sheet performing well and Logistics Development Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Logistics Development's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTOEF | 1.94 | (0.94) | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 65.00 | |||
| KARX | 6.43 | (0.18) | 0.00 | 0.01 | 7.26 | 17.78 | 67.21 | |||
| HRBR | 7.85 | 2.32 | 0.17 | (1.85) | 8.31 | 17.14 | 85.80 | |||
| TTNMF | 1.21 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 16.74 | |||
| WTLLF | 1.99 | 0.20 | 0.01 | (0.09) | 2.65 | 6.49 | 27.44 | |||
| NOKPF | 16.19 | 4.06 | 0.11 | 1.55 | 19.09 | 48.51 | 220.00 | |||
| EMFGF | 5.65 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 7.99 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 97.17 | |||
| CEBUY | 1.46 | 0.91 | 0.00 | (0.28) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 46.67 | |||
| ASFH | 1.78 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 51.87 | |||
| HPURF | 1.14 | (0.59) | 0.00 | 4.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 27.78 |
Be your own money manager
Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Logistics Development without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.Did you try this?
Run Price Exposure Probability Now
Price Exposure ProbabilityAnalyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets |
| All Next | Launch Module |
Logistics Development Corporate Management
| David Pickering | Chief Operations | Profile | |
| Mike Smith | Managing Freight | Profile | |
| Carl Stairs | Managing People | Profile | |
| John Milt | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Mark Duggan | Managing Network | Profile | |
| Rupert FCIS | Company Sec | Profile |