Latham Correlations
| SWIM Stock | USD 6.65 0.25 3.62% |
The current 90-days correlation between Latham Group and Apogee Enterprises is 0.36 (i.e., Weak diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Latham moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Latham Group moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
Latham Correlation With Market
Good diversification
The correlation between Latham Group and DJI is -0.1 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Latham Group and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Latham Stock
| 0.4 | NVJP | Umicore SA | PairCorr |
| 0.31 | PL | Planet Labs PBC Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
| 0.31 | TE | T1 Energy Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | FTON | Feintool International Earnings Call Tomorrow | PairCorr |
| 0.38 | 0N5 | XOMETRY INCCLA 000001 Earnings Call Today | PairCorr |
| 0.36 | NDX1 | Nordex SE Earnings Call Tomorrow | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Latham Stock performing well and Latham Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Latham's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOG | 1.67 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 2.76 | 4.38 | 17.55 | |||
| ULCC | 3.49 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 3.68 | 9.48 | 23.28 | |||
| ALTG | 2.46 | 0.54 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 2.24 | 7.06 | 15.56 | |||
| HTZ | 2.79 | (0.36) | 0.00 | (0.08) | 0.00 | 7.63 | 23.15 | |||
| WLFC | 2.22 | 0.60 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 2.05 | 5.42 | 11.06 | |||
| NX | 1.91 | 0.81 | 0.37 | 0.52 | 1.56 | 6.18 | 14.57 | |||
| MEG | 2.38 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 4.54 | 16.10 | |||
| ASPN | 2.78 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 3.36 | 6.01 | 18.76 | |||
| GLDD | 1.66 | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 1.27 | 4.63 | 16.08 | |||
| AEBI | 2.08 | 0.47 | 0.18 | (1.02) | 1.92 | 4.30 | 12.80 |
Latham Corporate Management
| James Borseth | Strategic Advisor | Profile | |
| Joel Culp | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Oliver Gloe | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Nikki Maczko | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Lance Dumont | Chief Staff | Profile | |
| Kaushal Dhruv | Chief Officer | Profile |