ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES (Germany) Top Management
| HNM Stock | EUR 74.48 0.60 0.80% |
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES employs about 26 people. The company is managed by 13 executives with a total tenure of roughly 114 years, averaging almost 8.0 years of service per executive, having 2.0 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Isaac Angel CEO Chief Executive Officer |
| Shlomi Argas President President, Executive Vice President - Operations and Products |
ORMAT |
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Management Team Effectiveness
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Workforce Comparison
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Other industry is currently estimated at about 96,519. ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES adds roughly 26.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Other industry.
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Price Series Summation is a cross summation of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES price series and its benchmark/peer.
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Notable Stakeholders
An ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Isaac Angel | Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Shlomi Argas | President, Executive Vice President - Operations and Products | Profile | |
| Doron Blachar | President, Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
| Zvi Krieger | Executive Vice President - Geothermal Resource | Profile | |
| Assaf Ginzburg | President, Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
| Ravit Barniv | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stanley Stern | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Dan Falk | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Granot | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Byron Wong | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Dafna Sharir | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stan Koyanagi | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Hezi Kattan | Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel | Profile |
About ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES often depends on how effective the management is. ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of ORMAT management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the ORMAT management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please note, the presentation of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's management manipulating its earnings.
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES within its industry.ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Manpower Efficiency
Return on ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 28.2M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 56.5M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 2.5M | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 5.1M |
Complementary Tools for ORMAT Stock analysis
When running ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's price analysis, check to measure ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES is operating at the current time. Most of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |