Digital Net Debt To E B I T D A from 2010 to 2024

DBGIW Stock  USD 16.60  0.38  2.24%   
Digital Brands Net Debt To EBITDA yearly trend continues to be fairly stable with very little volatility. Net Debt To EBITDA is likely to outpace its year average in 2024. Net Debt To EBITDA is a leverage ratio that indicates a company's ability to pay off its incurred debt. It compares a company's net debt (total debt minus cash) to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). View All Fundamentals
 
Net Debt To EBITDA  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
(321.71)
Current Value
(305.63)
Quarterly Volatility
110.23275785
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Check Digital Brands financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Digital Brands' main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Tax Provision of 386.4 K, Depreciation And Amortization of 3.4 M or Interest Expense of 4.5 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 0.0884, Dividend Yield of 0.0 or PTB Ratio of 0.91. Digital financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Digital Brands Valuation or Volatility modules.
  
Check out the analysis of Digital Brands Correlation against competitors.

Latest Digital Brands' Net Debt To E B I T D A Growth Pattern

Below is the plot of the Net Debt To E B I T D A of Digital Brands Group over the last few years. It is a leverage ratio that indicates a company's ability to pay off its incurred debt. It compares a company's net debt (total debt minus cash) to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). Digital Brands' Net Debt To EBITDA historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Digital Brands' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
Net Debt To E B I T D A10 Years Trend
Slightly volatile
   Net Debt To E B I T D A   
       Timeline  

Digital Net Debt To E B I T D A Regression Statistics

Arithmetic Mean(42.27)
Coefficient Of Variation(260.81)
Mean Deviation72.37
Median(0.63)
Standard Deviation110.23
Sample Variance12,151
Range322
R-Value(0.59)
Mean Square Error8,506
R-Squared0.35
Significance0.02
Slope(14.58)
Total Sum of Squares170,118

Digital Net Debt To E B I T D A History

2024 -305.63
2023 -321.71
2022 -0.94
2021 -0.63
2020 -1.59
2019 -1.09
2018 -0.8

About Digital Brands Financial Statements

Digital Brands investors use historical fundamental indicators, such as Digital Brands' Net Debt To E B I T D A, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Understanding over-time patterns can help investors decide on long-term investments in Digital Brands. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Net Debt To EBITDA(321.71)(305.63)

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Additional Tools for Digital Stock Analysis

When running Digital Brands' price analysis, check to measure Digital Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Digital Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Digital Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Digital Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Digital Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Digital Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.