Decision Net Income From Continuing Ops from 2010 to 2026
| DECN Stock | USD 0.0001 0.00 0.000003% |
Net Loss | First Reported 2012-12-31 | Previous Quarter -301.6 K | Current Value -554.9 K | Quarterly Volatility 3.6 M |
Check Decision Diagnostics financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Decision Diagnostics' main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Interest Expense of 32.9 M, Selling General Administrative of 2.6 M or Total Revenue of 1.7 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 2.65, Dividend Yield of 0.068 or PTB Ratio of 7.9. Decision financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Decision Diagnostics Valuation or Volatility modules.
Decision | Net Income From Continuing Ops | Build AI portfolio with Decision Stock |
Evaluating Decision Diagnostics's Net Income From Continuing Ops across multiple reporting periods reveals the company's ability to sustain growth and manage resources effectively. This longitudinal analysis highlights inflection points, cyclical patterns, and structural changes that short-term snapshots might miss, offering deeper insight into Decision Diagnostics's fundamental strength.
Latest Decision Diagnostics' Net Income From Continuing Ops Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income From Continuing Ops of Decision Diagnostics over the last few years. It is Decision Diagnostics' Net Loss historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Decision Diagnostics' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income From Continuing Ops |
| Timeline |
Decision Net Income From Continuing Ops Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | (13,055,380) | |
| Geometric Mean | 6,688,651 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | (103.59) | |
| Mean Deviation | 12,828,507 | |
| Median | (3,132,295) | |
| Standard Deviation | 13,523,777 | |
| Sample Variance | 182.9T | |
| Range | 31.4M | |
| R-Value | (0.85) | |
| Mean Square Error | 53T | |
| R-Squared | 0.73 | |
| Significance | 0.000013 | |
| Slope | (2,285,228) | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 2926.3T |
Decision Net Income From Continuing Ops History
About Decision Diagnostics Financial Statements
Decision Diagnostics investors utilize fundamental indicators, such as Net Income From Continuing Ops, to predict how Decision Stock might perform in the future. Analyzing these trends over time helps investors make informed market timing decisions. For further insights, please visit our fundamental analysis page.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -26.7 M | -25.4 M |
Pair Trading with Decision Diagnostics
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Decision Diagnostics position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Decision Diagnostics will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Decision Diagnostics could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Decision Diagnostics when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Decision Diagnostics - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Decision Diagnostics to buy it.
The correlation of Decision Diagnostics is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Decision Diagnostics moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Decision Diagnostics moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Decision Diagnostics can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out the analysis of Decision Diagnostics Correlation against competitors. To learn how to invest in Decision Stock, please use our How to Invest in Decision Diagnostics guide.You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Will Health Care Technology sector continue expanding? Could Decision diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Decision Diagnostics. Projected growth potential of Decision fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Decision Diagnostics data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Earnings Share (0.02) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0) | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
Understanding Decision Diagnostics requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Decision's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Decision Diagnostics' is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Decision Diagnostics' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Decision Diagnostics' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Decision Diagnostics should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Decision Diagnostics' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.