Dine Total Current Liabilities from 2010 to 2024
| DIN Stock | USD 32.61 0.12 0.37% |
Total Current Liabilities | First Reported 1990-12-31 | Previous Quarter 394.2 M | Current Value 386.9 M | Quarterly Volatility 135.9 M |
Check Dine Brands financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Dine Brands' main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Depreciation And Amortization of 26.5 M, Interest Expense of 51.9 M or Selling General Administrative of 188.2 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 1.74, Dividend Yield of 0.0344 or Days Sales Outstanding of 41.96. Dine financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Dine Brands Valuation or Volatility modules.
Dine | Total Current Liabilities |
Latest Dine Brands' Total Current Liabilities Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Total Current Liabilities of Dine Brands Global over the last few years. Total Current Liabilities is an item on Dine Brands balance sheet that include short term debt, accounts payable, accrued salaries payable, payroll taxes payable, accrued liabilities and other debts. Total Current Liabilities of Dine Brands Global are important to investors because some useful performance ratios such as Current Ratio and Quick Ratio require Total Current Liabilities to be accurate. It is the total amount of liabilities that a company is expected to pay within one year, including debts, accounts payable, and other short-term financial obligations. Dine Brands' Total Current Liabilities historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Dine Brands' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Total Current Liabilities | 10 Years Trend |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
| Timeline |
Dine Total Current Liabilities Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 324,727,573 | |
| Geometric Mean | 280,328,125 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 34.88 | |
| Mean Deviation | 77,799,088 | |
| Median | 313,049,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 113,277,537 | |
| Sample Variance | 12831.8T | |
| Range | 463.8M | |
| R-Value | 0.88 | |
| Mean Square Error | 3124.1T | |
| R-Squared | 0.77 | |
| Significance | 0.000015 | |
| Slope | 22,283,233 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 179645.2T |
Dine Total Current Liabilities History
About Dine Brands Financial Statements
Dine Brands investors utilize fundamental indicators, such as Total Current Liabilities, to predict how Dine Stock might perform in the future. Analyzing these trends over time helps investors make informed market timing decisions. For further insights, please visit our fundamental analysis page.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Total Current Liabilities | 460.5 M | 483.5 M |
Pair Trading with Dine Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Dine Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out the analysis of Dine Brands Correlation against competitors. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. If investors know Dine will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dine Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.046 | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 6.01 | Revenue Per Share 54.322 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of Dine Brands Global is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dine that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dine Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dine Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dine Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dine Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dine Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dine Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.