Magna International Cash Flow To Debt Ratio History

MGA Stock  USD 60.05  0.51  0.86%   
Cash Flow to Debt Ratio stood at 0.44 as of December 31, 2025. Cash Flow to Debt Ratio is a reported line item on Magna International's cash flow statement, reflecting the company's leverage and financing commitments. Over the last 16 observed reporting periods, Cash Flow to Debt Ratio has moved lower across reporting periods with an R-squared of 0.38. View All Fundamentals
 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio  
 First Reported
2010-12-31
 Previous Quarter
0.44
 Current Value
0.44
 Quarterly Volatility
2.05
Macro event markers
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
 
Interest Hikes

Latest Magna International Cash Flow To Debt Ratio Growth Pattern

Cash Flow To Debt Ratio10 Years Trend
Moderate Decline
   Cash Flow To Debt Ratio   
       Timeline  

Cash Flow To Debt Ratio Trend Statistics

Across 15 reporting periods, Magna International's Cash Flow To Debt Ratio registers a CV of 125.5%, signaling elevated dispersion relative to the mean. The linear fit (R² = 0.38) suggests a moderate linear trend with partial explanatory power.
Arithmetic Mean 1.63
Geometric Mean 0.91
Coefficient Of Variation 125.55
Mean Deviation 1.55
Median 0.79
Standard Deviation 2.05
Sample Variance 4.18
Range6.7395
R-Value-0.61
Mean Square Error 2.78
R-Squared 0.38
Significance 0.01
Slope-0.25
Total Sum of Squares 66.95

Magna International Cash Flow To Debt Ratio History

Across 15 reported periods (2011–2026), Magna International's Cash Flow To Debt Ratio has moved from 5 to 0.
2026 0.42
2024 0.51
2023 0.44
2022 0.41
2021 0.52
2020 0.55
2019 0.79
2018 0.85
2017 0.93
2016 1.07
2015 0.9
2014 2.66
2013 6.88
2012 4.99
2011 5.19

Correlation of Cash Flow To Debt Ratio With Other Accounts

Correlation values indicate the degree of linear co-movement between Magna International's Cash Flow To Debt Ratio and other reported accounts. Values near +1 or −1 suggest strong association; values near 0 suggest independence. These relationships are descriptive and do not imply causation.

Related Fundamentals

Last ReportedEnd Of Year Estimate
Cash$1.61 billion$1.39 billion
Cash And Short Term Investments$1.61 billion$1.39 billion
Cash And Equivalents$652 million$914.13 million
Change In Cash$362.81 million$380.95 million
Free Cash Flow$1.82 billion$1.91 billion
Begin Period Cash Flow$1.25 billion$1.39 billion
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities$-1.73 billion$-1.82 billion
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities$-184.17 million$-174.96 million
Other Non Cash Items$777.37 million$816.24 million
Total Cash From Operating Activities$3.66 billion$1.92 billion
Total Cash From Financing Activities$-1.56 billion$-1.48 billion
End Period Cash Flow$1.61 billion$1.44 billion
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities$-387 million$-367.65 million
Free Cash Flow Yield12.00%13.00%
Operating Cash Flow Per Share1313.65
Free Cash Flow Per Share6.456.77
Cash Per Share5.716
Capex To Operating Cash Flow$0.5$0.76
EV To Operating Cash Flow$5.94$7.37
EV To Free Cash Flow$11.96$11.36
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio4.1x7.17x
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio8.26x7.85x
Cash Ratio0.150.14
Cash Conversion Cycle$38.4$45.29
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio0.090.08
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio0.50.52
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios0.44x0.42x
Price Cash Flow Ratio4.17.17

Methodology, Assumptions & Data Sources

The Cash Flow To Debt Ratio trend for Magna International is contextualized below with regression and dispersion statistics. Period-over-period changes in this line item trace to underlying business decisions visible in the financial statements. For Magna International in the Automotive Parts & Equipment sector, Cash Flow To Debt Ratio captures the scale of obligations used to fund operations and growth.

Magna International values are built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with reporting definitions aligned before display. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies. Reference data and historical patterns are presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation or advice.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board