RadNet Cash Flow To Debt Ratio from 2010 to 2025

RDNT Stock  USD 68.25  0.27  0.40%   
RadNet Cash Flow To Debt Ratio yearly trend continues to be comparatively stable with very little volatility. Cash Flow To Debt Ratio will likely drop to 0.08 in 2025. From the period from 2010 to 2025, RadNet Cash Flow To Debt Ratio quarterly data regression had mean square error of  0 and mean deviation of  0.04. View All Fundamentals
 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
0.13
Current Value
0.08
Quarterly Volatility
0.05386904
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Check RadNet financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among RadNet's main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Depreciation And Amortization of 228.8 M, Interest Expense of 77.9 M or Total Revenue of 2 B, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 1.29, Dividend Yield of 0.0013 or PTB Ratio of 4.23. RadNet financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with RadNet Valuation or Volatility modules.
  
Check out the analysis of RadNet Correlation against competitors.

Latest RadNet's Cash Flow To Debt Ratio Growth Pattern

Below is the plot of the Cash Flow To Debt Ratio of RadNet Inc over the last few years. It is RadNet's Cash Flow To Debt Ratio historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in RadNet's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio10 Years Trend
Pretty Stable
   Cash Flow To Debt Ratio   
       Timeline  

RadNet Cash Flow To Debt Ratio Regression Statistics

Arithmetic Mean0.12
Coefficient Of Variation44.45
Mean Deviation0.04
Median0.11
Standard Deviation0.05
Sample Variance0
Range0.2403
R-Value0.26
Mean Square Error0
R-Squared0.07
Significance0.32
Slope0
Total Sum of Squares0.04

RadNet Cash Flow To Debt Ratio History

2025 0.08
2023 0.15
2022 0.0967
2020 0.2
2019 0.0883
2018 0.17
2017 0.23

About RadNet Financial Statements

RadNet shareholders use historical fundamental indicators, such as Cash Flow To Debt Ratio, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Although RadNet investors may analyze each financial statement separately, they are all interrelated. The changes in RadNet's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses on on RadNet's income statement. Understanding these patterns can help investors time the market effectively. Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio 0.13  0.08 

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Explore Investing Ideas  

Additional Tools for RadNet Stock Analysis

When running RadNet's price analysis, check to measure RadNet's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy RadNet is operating at the current time. Most of RadNet's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of RadNet's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move RadNet's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of RadNet to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.