WR1 Net Tangible Assets from 2010 to 2026

WR1 Stock  EUR 58.06  1.08  1.90%   
W R's Net Tangible Assets are increasing over the last several years with slightly volatile swings. Net Tangible Assets are predicted to flatten to about 5.9 B. Net Tangible Assets is the total assets of W R Berkley minus any intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, and goodwill; it represents the physical assets of a company. View All Fundamentals
 
Net Tangible Assets  
First Reported
2016-12-31
Previous Quarter
6.5 B
Current Value
6.7 B
Quarterly Volatility
560.3 M
 
Covid
 
Interest Hikes
Check W R financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among W R's main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Interest Expense of 99.3 M, Total Revenue of 10 B or Gross Profit of 3.6 B, as well as many indicators such as . WR1 financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with W R Valuation or Volatility modules.
  
This module can also supplement various W R Technical models . Check out the analysis of W R Correlation against competitors.
The Net Tangible Assets trend for W R Berkley offers valuable insights into the company's financial trajectory and strategic direction. By examining multi-year patterns, investors can identify whether W R is strengthening or weakening its position, and how this metric correlates with broader market conditions and industry benchmarks.

Latest W R's Net Tangible Assets Growth Pattern

Below is the plot of the Net Tangible Assets of W R Berkley over the last few years. It is the total assets of a company minus any intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, and goodwill; it represents the physical assets of a company. W R's Net Tangible Assets historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in W R's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
Net Tangible Assets10 Years Trend
Slightly volatile
   Net Tangible Assets   
       Timeline  

WR1 Net Tangible Assets Regression Statistics

Arithmetic Mean5,421,757,166
Geometric Mean5,333,903,573
Coefficient Of Variation18.73
Mean Deviation896,581,940
Median5,160,814,000
Standard Deviation1,015,565,955
Sample Variance1031374.2T
Range3.1B
R-Value0.92
Mean Square Error172606.3T
R-Squared0.84
Slope184,662,473
Total Sum of Squares16501987.3T

WR1 Net Tangible Assets History

20265.9 B
20257.4 B
20226.5 B
20216.4 B
2020B
20195.8 B
20185.2 B

About W R Financial Statements

W R stakeholders use historical fundamental indicators, such as W R's Net Tangible Assets, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Although W R investors may analyze each financial statement separately, they are all interrelated. For example, changes in W R's assets and liabilities are reflected in the revenues and expenses on W R's income statement, which ultimately affect the company's gains or losses. Understanding these patterns can help in making the right long-term investment decisions in W R Berkley. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Net Tangible Assets7.4 B5.9 B

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether W R Berkley offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of W R's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of W R Berkley Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on W R Berkley Stock:
Check out the analysis of W R Correlation against competitors.
You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.
Please note, there is a significant difference between W R's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if W R is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. In contrast, W R's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.