Solo Brands Corporate Bonds and Leverage Analysis

DTC Stock  USD 1.00  0  0.40%   
Solo Brands holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.323. At present, Solo Brands' Short Term Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Net Debt To EBITDA is expected to grow to 3.17, whereas Short and Long Term Debt Total is forecasted to decline to about 115.8 M. With a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Solo Brands' Earnings Per Share (EPS).

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Solo Brands' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Solo Brands' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Solo Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Solo Brands' stakeholders.
For most companies, including Solo Brands, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Solo Brands, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Solo Brands' management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
0.3474
Book Value
2.869
Operating Margin
(0.34)
Profit Margin
(0.42)
Return On Assets
(0.03)
The current year's Non Current Liabilities Other is expected to grow to about 7.9 M, whereas Total Current Liabilities is forecasted to decline to about 76.4 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Solo Brands Fundamentals Over Time.
For information on how to trade Solo Stock refer to our How to Trade Solo Stock guide.
View Bond Profile
Given the importance of Solo Brands' capital structure, the first step in the capital decision process is for the management of Solo Brands to decide how much external capital it will need to raise to operate in a sustainable way. Once the amount of financing is determined, management needs to examine the financial markets to determine the terms in which the company can boost capital. This move is crucial to the process because the market environment may reduce the ability of Solo Brands to issue bonds at a reasonable cost.

Solo Brands Bond Ratings

Solo Brands financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Solo Brands have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Solo Brands' borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
4
PoorView
Beneish M Score
(4.06)
Unlikely ManipulatorView

Solo Brands Debt to Cash Allocation

As Solo Brands follows its natural business cycle, the capital allocation decisions will not magically go away. Solo Brands' decision-makers have to determine if most of the cash flows will be poured back into or reinvested in the business, reserved for other projects beyond operational needs, or paid back to stakeholders and investors.
Solo Brands has 182.48 M in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 0.32, which is OK given its current industry classification. Solo Brands has a current ratio of 3.94, demonstrating that it is liquid and is capable to disburse its financial commitments when the payables are due. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Solo to invest in growth at high rates of return.

Solo Brands Total Assets Over Time

Solo Brands Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Solo Brands uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Solo Brands Debt Ratio

    
  14.0   
It looks as if most of the Solo Brands' assets are financed through equity. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Solo Brands' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Solo Brands, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Solo Brands Corporate Bonds Issued

Most Solo bonds can be classified according to their maturity, which is the date when Solo Brands has to pay back the principal to investors. Maturities can be short-term, medium-term, or long-term (more than ten years). Longer-term bonds usually offer higher interest rates but may entail additional risks.

Solo Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

115.79 Million

At present, Solo Brands' Short and Long Term Debt Total is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.

Understaning Solo Brands Use of Financial Leverage

Solo Brands' financial leverage ratio helps determine the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Solo Brands' total debt position, including all outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with Solo Brands' equity. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Solo Brands' owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if Solo Brands is unable to cover its debt costs.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total209.8 M115.8 M
Net Debt187 M196.4 M
Long Term Debt164.4 M104 M
Long Term Debt Total124.6 M90.7 M
Short Term Debt15.9 M16.7 M
Short and Long Term Debt7.2 M4.1 M
Net Debt To EBITDA 3.02  3.17 
Debt To Equity 0.68  0.71 
Interest Debt Per Share 2.88  3.02 
Debt To Assets 0.25  0.14 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.33  0.21 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.39  0.22 
Debt Equity Ratio 0.68  0.71 
Debt Ratio 0.25  0.14 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio 0.31  0.32 
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Solo Brands offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Solo Brands' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Solo Brands Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Solo Brands Stock:
Check out the analysis of Solo Brands Fundamentals Over Time.
For information on how to trade Solo Stock refer to our How to Trade Solo Stock guide.
You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Is Leisure Products space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Solo Brands. If investors know Solo will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Solo Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.98)
Earnings Share
(3.35)
Revenue Per Share
8.184
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.15)
Return On Assets
(0.03)
The market value of Solo Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Solo that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Solo Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Solo Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Solo Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Solo Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Solo Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Solo Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Solo Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.