Geospace Technologies Corporate Bonds and Leverage Analysis
GEOS Stock | USD 13.62 1.19 9.57% |
Geospace Technologies holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.008. Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop to about 840.1 K in 2024. Net Debt is likely to gain to about (15.4 M) in 2024. Geospace Technologies' financial risk is the risk to Geospace Technologies stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.
Asset vs Debt
Equity vs Debt
Geospace Technologies' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Geospace Technologies' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Geospace Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Geospace Technologies' stakeholders.
For most companies, including Geospace Technologies, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Geospace Technologies, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Geospace Technologies' management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book 1.1676 | Book Value 10.514 | Operating Margin (0.09) | Profit Margin 0.0828 | Return On Assets 0.0421 |
Geospace |
Given the importance of Geospace Technologies' capital structure, the first step in the capital decision process is for the management of Geospace Technologies to decide how much external capital it will need to raise to operate in a sustainable way. Once the amount of financing is determined, management needs to examine the financial markets to determine the terms in which the company can boost capital. This move is crucial to the process because the market environment may reduce the ability of Geospace Technologies to issue bonds at a reasonable cost.
Geospace Technologies Bond Ratings
Geospace Technologies financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Geospace Technologies have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Geospace Technologies' borrowing costs.Piotroski F Score | 7 | Strong | View |
Beneish M Score | (2.61) | Unlikely Manipulator | View |
Geospace Technologies Debt to Cash Allocation
Many companies such as Geospace Technologies, eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
Geospace Technologies currently holds 769 K in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.01, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. Geospace Technologies has a current ratio of 4.53, suggesting that it is liquid enough and is able to pay its financial obligations when due. Note, when we think about Geospace Technologies' use of debt, we should always consider it together with its cash and equity.Geospace Technologies Total Assets Over Time
Geospace Technologies Assets Financed by Debt
The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Geospace Technologies uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.Geospace Technologies Debt Ratio | 0.19 |
Geospace Technologies Corporate Bonds Issued
Geospace Short Long Term Debt Total
Short Long Term Debt Total |
|
Understaning Geospace Technologies Use of Financial Leverage
Geospace Technologies' financial leverage ratio measures its total debt position, including all of its outstanding liabilities, and compares it to Geospace Technologies' current equity. If creditors own a majority of Geospace Technologies' assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of Geospace Technologies' outstanding bonds gives an idea of how risky it is and if it is worth investing in.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Short and Long Term Debt Total | 884.4 K | 840.1 K | |
Net Debt | -16.2 M | -15.4 M | |
Short Term Debt | 295.6 K | 280.8 K | |
Long Term Debt Total | 837.9 K | 744.8 K | |
Net Debt To EBITDA | (0.79) | (0.75) | |
Interest Debt Per Share | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio | (47.88) | (45.49) |
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Additional Tools for Geospace Stock Analysis
When running Geospace Technologies' price analysis, check to measure Geospace Technologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Geospace Technologies is operating at the current time. Most of Geospace Technologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Geospace Technologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Geospace Technologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Geospace Technologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
What is Financial Leverage?
Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.Leverage and Capital Costs
The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.Benefits of Financial Leverage
Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:- Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
- It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
- Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.