Monolithic Power Systems Corporate Bonds and Leverage Analysis

MPWR Stock  USD 580.81  8.34  1.46%   
Monolithic Power Systems holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.002. As of 11/25/2024, Interest Debt Per Share is likely to grow to 0.29, though Net Debt is likely to grow to (496.2 M). . Monolithic Power's financial risk is the risk to Monolithic Power stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Monolithic Power's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Monolithic Power's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Monolithic Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Monolithic Power's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Monolithic Power, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Monolithic Power Systems, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Monolithic Power's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
12.0475
Book Value
48.211
Operating Margin
0.2645
Profit Margin
0.2129
Return On Assets
0.1171
At this time, Monolithic Power's Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Total Current Liabilities is likely to grow to about 246.8 M, while Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to drop slightly above 2.1 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Monolithic Power Fundamentals Over Time.
View Bond Profile
Given the importance of Monolithic Power's capital structure, the first step in the capital decision process is for the management of Monolithic Power to decide how much external capital it will need to raise to operate in a sustainable way. Once the amount of financing is determined, management needs to examine the financial markets to determine the terms in which the company can boost capital. This move is crucial to the process because the market environment may reduce the ability of Monolithic Power Systems to issue bonds at a reasonable cost.

Monolithic Power Bond Ratings

Monolithic Power Systems financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Monolithic Power have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Monolithic Power's borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
7
StrongView
Beneish M Score
(2.83)
Unlikely ManipulatorView

Monolithic Power Systems Debt to Cash Allocation

Many companies such as Monolithic Power, eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
Monolithic Power Systems currently holds 7.87 M in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.0, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. Monolithic Power Systems has a current ratio of 4.46, suggesting that it is liquid enough and is able to pay its financial obligations when due. Note, when we think about Monolithic Power's use of debt, we should always consider it together with its cash and equity.

Monolithic Power Common Stock Shares Outstanding Over Time

Monolithic Power Assets Financed by Debt

Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Monolithic Power's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Monolithic Power, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Monolithic Power Corporate Bonds Issued

Monolithic Net Debt

Net Debt

(496.16 Million)

Monolithic Power reported last year Net Debt of (522.28 Million)

Understaning Monolithic Power Use of Financial Leverage

Monolithic Power's financial leverage ratio measures its total debt position, including all of its outstanding liabilities, and compares it to Monolithic Power's current equity. If creditors own a majority of Monolithic Power's assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of Monolithic Power's outstanding bonds gives an idea of how risky it is and if it is worth investing in.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Net Debt-522.3 M-496.2 M
Short and Long Term Debt Total7.9 MM
Short Term Debt2.3 M2.1 M
Net Debt To EBITDA(1.00)(1.05)
Interest Debt Per Share 0.28  0.29 
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Pair Trading with Monolithic Power

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Monolithic Power position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monolithic Power will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Monolithic Stock

  0.78VECO Veeco InstrumentsPairCorr
  0.77FORM FormFactorPairCorr
  0.82TER TeradynePairCorr

Moving against Monolithic Stock

  0.91EHGO Eshallgo Class A Downward RallyPairCorr
  0.79CWAN Clearwater AnalyticsPairCorr
  0.65ASAN Asana IncPairCorr
  0.59CSCO Cisco Systems Aggressive PushPairCorr
  0.48INTC Intel Fiscal Year End 23rd of January 2025 PairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Monolithic Power could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Monolithic Power when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Monolithic Power - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Monolithic Power Systems to buy it.
The correlation of Monolithic Power is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Monolithic Power moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Monolithic Power Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Monolithic Power can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Additional Tools for Monolithic Stock Analysis

When running Monolithic Power's price analysis, check to measure Monolithic Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Monolithic Power is operating at the current time. Most of Monolithic Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Monolithic Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Monolithic Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Monolithic Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.