Planet Green Holdings Corporate Bonds and Leverage Analysis

PLAG Stock  USD 2.80  0.03  1.08%   
Planet Green Holdings holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.119. At this time, Planet Green's Long Term Debt To Capitalization is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Planet Green's current Debt Equity Ratio is estimated to increase to 0.21, while Net Debt is projected to decrease to roughly 3.2 M. . Planet Green's financial risk is the risk to Planet Green stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Planet Green's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Planet Green's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Planet Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Planet Green's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Planet Green, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Planet Green Holdings, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Planet Green's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
1.3009
Book Value
2.697
Operating Margin
(0.63)
Profit Margin
(0.16)
Return On Assets
(0.12)
At this time, Planet Green's Total Current Liabilities is most likely to decrease significantly in the upcoming years. The Planet Green's current Non Current Liabilities Total is estimated to increase to about 6.7 M, while Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is projected to decrease to roughly 40.5 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Planet Green Fundamentals Over Time.
View Bond Profile
Given the importance of Planet Green's capital structure, the first step in the capital decision process is for the management of Planet Green to decide how much external capital it will need to raise to operate in a sustainable way. Once the amount of financing is determined, management needs to examine the financial markets to determine the terms in which the company can boost capital. This move is crucial to the process because the market environment may reduce the ability of Planet Green Holdings to issue bonds at a reasonable cost.

Planet Green Bond Ratings

Planet Green Holdings financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Planet Green have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Planet Green's borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
4
PoorView
Beneish M Score
(4.38)
Unlikely ManipulatorView

Planet Green Holdings Debt to Cash Allocation

Many companies such as Planet Green, eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
Planet Green Holdings currently holds 3.81 M in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.12, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. Planet Green Holdings has a current ratio of 0.75, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations when due. Note, when we think about Planet Green's use of debt, we should always consider it together with its cash and equity.

Planet Green Total Assets Over Time

Planet Green Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Planet Green uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Planet Green Debt Ratio

    
  8.5   
It seems as most of the Planet Green's assets are financed through equity. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Planet Green's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Planet Green, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Planet Green Corporate Bonds Issued

Most Planet bonds can be classified according to their maturity, which is the date when Planet Green Holdings has to pay back the principal to investors. Maturities can be short-term, medium-term, or long-term (more than ten years). Longer-term bonds usually offer higher interest rates but may entail additional risks.

Planet Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

3.62 Million

At this time, Planet Green's Short and Long Term Debt Total is most likely to decrease significantly in the upcoming years.

Understaning Planet Green Use of Financial Leverage

Planet Green's financial leverage ratio helps determine the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Planet Green's total debt position, including all outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with Planet Green's equity. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Planet Green's owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if Planet Green is unable to cover its debt costs.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total3.8 M3.6 M
Net Debt3.4 M3.2 M
Short Term Debt1.2 B1.3 B
Long Term Debt258.4 K245.5 K
Long Term Debt Total9.5 MM
Short and Long Term Debt3.2 M3.1 M
Net Debt To EBITDA(0.51)(0.54)
Debt To Equity 0.20  0.21 
Interest Debt Per Share 0.60  0.57 
Debt To Assets 0.09  0.09 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.16  0.17 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.16  0.13 
Debt Equity Ratio 0.20  0.21 
Debt Ratio 0.09  0.09 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio(1.39)(1.45)
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Planet Green Holdings is a strong investment it is important to analyze Planet Green's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Planet Green's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Planet Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out the analysis of Planet Green Fundamentals Over Time.
You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Is Packaged Foods & Meats space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Planet Green. If investors know Planet will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Planet Green listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share
(1.47)
Revenue Per Share
2.426
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.57)
Return On Assets
(0.12)
Return On Equity
(0.49)
The market value of Planet Green Holdings is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Planet that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Planet Green's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Planet Green's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Planet Green's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Planet Green's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Planet Green's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Planet Green is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Planet Green's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.