Ruth Marshall - Global Payments Independent Director
GPN Stock | USD 117.05 0.72 0.62% |
Director
Ms. Ruth Ann Marshall is an Independent Director of the Company. Ms. Marshall is a member of the boards of Regions Financial Corporation, ConAgra Foods, Pella Corporation and Trustwave. She is active in the community and has served on boards of several civic and academic organizations including the PGA First Tee, the Cox School of Business at Southern Methodist University and the Aspen Santa Fe Ballet. In May 2006, Ruth Ann Marshall retired as President of the Americas, MasterCard International, where she was responsible for building all aspects of MasterCards issuance and acceptance business in the United States, Canada, Latin America and the Caribbean. The Americas Region of MasterCard generated more than half of the companys worldwide volume in 2005. Ms. Marshall joined MasterCard in 1999 as President of MasterCard North America and was instrumental in growing MasterCards share of payments. Before joining MasterCard, Ms. Marshall served as Group Executive President of two electronic payment service companies, MAC Regional Network and Buypass Corporationrationration. Upon acquisition of these companies by Concord EFS, she became Senior Executive Vice President of the combined companies, where she oversaw marketing, account management, customer service and product development. In April 1999, she was awarded Credit Card Managements Leader of the New Millennium Award for the payments industry. Ms. Marshall started her career at IBM, where, over 18 years, she served in managerial and executive positions. In 2004 and 2005, Ms. Marshall was selected by Forbes.com as one of the Worlds 100 Most Powerful Women since 2006.
Age | 66 |
Tenure | 18 years |
Address | 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, GA, United States, 30326 |
Phone | 770 829 8000 |
Web | https://www.globalpayments.com/en-ap |
Global Payments Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0316 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0316 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0606 %, implying that it generated $0.0606 on every 100 dollars invested. Global Payments' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Global Payments manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.07. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.04. At this time, Global Payments' Intangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 7.85, though Net Tangible Assets are likely to grow to (9.1 B).Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
Peter Bensen | CarMax Inc | 58 | |
Thomas Baltimore | AutoNation | 55 | |
Kirk Arnold | Thomson Reuters Corp | 60 | |
Michael DeGroote | CBIZ Inc | 60 | |
Ronald Blaylock | CarMax Inc | 60 | |
Jacqueline Travisano | AutoNation | 50 | |
Daniel Heinrich | Aramark Holdings | 64 | |
Todd Slotkin | CBIZ Inc | 68 | |
Daniel Berce | AZZ Incorporated | 66 | |
Peter Thomson | Thomson Reuters Corp | 54 | |
Jane Bomba | BrightView Holdings | 58 | |
Deanna Oppenheimer | Thomson Reuters Corp | 62 | |
David Robino | Lithia Motors | 61 | |
Louis Miramontes | Lithia Motors | 66 | |
Richard Roedel | BrightView Holdings | 71 | |
Susan Cain | Lithia Motors | 66 | |
Joshua Weisenbeck | BrightView Holdings | 38 | |
Gina France | CBIZ Inc | 62 | |
Shamit Grover | BrightView Holdings | 37 | |
Steven Gerard | AutoNation | 75 | |
Winifred Webb | ABM Industries Incorporated | 63 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.0606 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.0316 |
Global Payments Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Global Payments' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Global Payments inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Global. The board's role is to monitor Global Payments' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Global Payments' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Global Payments' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Kriss Cloninger, Lead Independent Director | ||
Shannon Johnston, Senior Officer | ||
Connie McDaniel, Independent Director | ||
David Esq, Chief Officer | ||
Joshua Whipple, Chief Officer | ||
John Bruno, Independent Director | ||
Robert Baldwin, Independent Director | ||
Jeffrey Sloan, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Phyllis McNeill, Vice Communications | ||
Frank Young, Senior Vice President - Global Product and Innovation | ||
John Turner, Independent Director | ||
Dara SteeleBelkin, Executive Counsel | ||
Robert Cortopassi, President COO | ||
Gaylon Jowers, President Solutions | ||
Winnie Smith, Senior Relations | ||
William Plummer, Independent Director | ||
Andra Carter, Senior Officer | ||
Ruth Marshall, Independent Director | ||
Cameron Bready, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Executive Vice President | ||
David Rumph, Executive Officer | ||
M Woods, Chairman of the Board | ||
David Sheffield, Chief Accounting Officer and Sr. VP | ||
Winnie CFA, Senior Relations | ||
Paul Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Heather Ross, Executive officer | ||
Jeffrey JD, CEO Director | ||
David Green, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
Cameron CPA, CEO President | ||
William Jacobs, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Ryan Loy, Chief Officer | ||
F Arroyo, Independent Director | ||
Joia Johnson, Independent Director | ||
Guido Sacchi, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer |
Global Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Global Payments a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.0606 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.0316 | |||
Profit Margin | 0.14 % | |||
Operating Margin | 0.27 % | |||
Current Valuation | 43.84 B | |||
Shares Outstanding | 254.5 M | |||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.85 % | |||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 95.40 % | |||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 6.29 M | |||
Price To Earning | 434.19 X |
Pair Trading with Global Payments
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Global Payments position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Payments will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Global Stock
Moving against Global Stock
0.43 | BW | Babcock Wilcox Enter | PairCorr |
0.41 | GPAK | Gamer Pakistan Common | PairCorr |
0.39 | DE | Deere Company Fiscal Year End 27th of November 2024 | PairCorr |
0.39 | FA | First Advantage Corp | PairCorr |
0.32 | EH | Ehang Holdings | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Global Payments could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Global Payments when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Global Payments - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Global Payments to buy it.
The correlation of Global Payments is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Global Payments moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Global Payments moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Global Payments can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Global Payments. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. To learn how to invest in Global Stock, please use our How to Invest in Global Payments guide.You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Is Transaction & Payment Processing Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Global Payments. If investors know Global will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Global Payments listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.11) | Dividend Share 1 | Earnings Share 5.31 | Revenue Per Share 39.009 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.051 |
The market value of Global Payments is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Global that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Global Payments' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Global Payments' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Global Payments' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Global Payments' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Global Payments' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Global Payments is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Global Payments' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.