Correlation Between Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kaufman Et Broad and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kaufman Et with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital

0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kaufman and Litigation is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kaufman Et Broad and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Kaufman Et is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kaufman Et Broad are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Kaufman Et i.e., Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Kaufman Et is expected to generate 1.58 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Kaufman Et Broad is 1.32 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,769  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,806  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 71.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Kaufman Et Broad  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Kaufman Et Broad 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kaufman Et Broad are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Kaufman Et is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kaufman Et and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kaufman Et position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Kaufman Et Broad and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance