Correlation Between Harvest Fund and Panda Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Harvest Fund and Panda Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Harvest Fund and Panda Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Harvest Fund Management and Panda Financial Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Harvest Fund and Panda Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Harvest Fund with a short position of Panda Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Harvest Fund and Panda Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Harvest Fund and Panda Financial

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Harvest and Panda is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Harvest Fund Management and Panda Financial Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Panda Financial Holding and Harvest Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Harvest Fund Management are associated (or correlated) with Panda Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Panda Financial Holding has no effect on the direction of Harvest Fund i.e., Harvest Fund and Panda Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Harvest Fund and Panda Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Harvest Fund is expected to generate 1032.0 times less return on investment than Panda Financial. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Harvest Fund Management is 7.4 times less risky than Panda Financial. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Panda Financial Holding is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,251  in Panda Financial Holding on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  266.00  from holding Panda Financial Holding or generate 21.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Harvest Fund Management  vs.  Panda Financial Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Harvest Fund Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Harvest Fund Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Harvest Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Panda Financial Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Panda Financial Holding are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Panda Financial sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Harvest Fund and Panda Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Harvest Fund and Panda Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Harvest Fund and Panda Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Harvest Fund position performs unexpectedly, Panda Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Panda Financial will offset losses from the drop in Panda Financial's long position.
The idea behind Harvest Fund Management and Panda Financial Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins