Correlation Between Bank of China and Spring Airlines

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of China and Spring Airlines at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of China and Spring Airlines into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of China and Spring Airlines Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of China and Spring Airlines and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of China with a short position of Spring Airlines. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of China and Spring Airlines.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of China and Spring Airlines

0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Spring is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of China and Spring Airlines Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Airlines and Bank of China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of China are associated (or correlated) with Spring Airlines. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Airlines has no effect on the direction of Bank of China i.e., Bank of China and Spring Airlines go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of China and Spring Airlines

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of China is expected to generate 0.69 times more return on investment than Spring Airlines. However, Bank of China is 1.46 times less risky than Spring Airlines. It trades about 0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Airlines Co is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  481.00  in Bank of China on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  40.00  from holding Bank of China or generate 8.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of China  vs.  Spring Airlines Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Bank of China sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Spring Airlines 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spring Airlines Co are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Spring Airlines sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of China and Spring Airlines Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of China and Spring Airlines

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of China and Spring Airlines positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of China position performs unexpectedly, Spring Airlines can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Airlines will offset losses from the drop in Spring Airlines' long position.
The idea behind Bank of China and Spring Airlines Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities