Correlation Between Baker Hughes and Penn National

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Baker Hughes and Penn National at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Baker Hughes and Penn National into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Baker Hughes Co and Penn National Gaming, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Baker Hughes and Penn National and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Baker Hughes with a short position of Penn National. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Baker Hughes and Penn National.

Diversification Opportunities for Baker Hughes and Penn National

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Baker and Penn is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Baker Hughes Co and Penn National Gaming in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penn National Gaming and Baker Hughes is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Baker Hughes Co are associated (or correlated) with Penn National. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penn National Gaming has no effect on the direction of Baker Hughes i.e., Baker Hughes and Penn National go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Baker Hughes and Penn National

Assuming the 90 days horizon Baker Hughes Co is expected to generate 0.91 times more return on investment than Penn National. However, Baker Hughes Co is 1.1 times less risky than Penn National. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Penn National Gaming is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,438  in Baker Hughes Co on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  668.00  from holding Baker Hughes Co or generate 19.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Baker Hughes Co  vs.  Penn National Gaming

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Baker Hughes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Baker Hughes Co are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Baker Hughes reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Penn National reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Baker Hughes and Penn National Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Baker Hughes and Penn National

The main advantage of trading using opposite Baker Hughes and Penn National positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Baker Hughes position performs unexpectedly, Penn National can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penn National will offset losses from the drop in Penn National's long position.
The idea behind Baker Hughes Co and Penn National Gaming pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm