Correlation Between Analyst IMS and Payment Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Analyst IMS and Payment Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Analyst IMS and Payment Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Analyst IMS Investment and Payment Financial Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Analyst IMS and Payment Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Analyst IMS with a short position of Payment Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Analyst IMS and Payment Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Analyst IMS and Payment Financial

0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Analyst and Payment is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Analyst IMS Investment and Payment Financial Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Payment Financial and Analyst IMS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Analyst IMS Investment are associated (or correlated) with Payment Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Payment Financial has no effect on the direction of Analyst IMS i.e., Analyst IMS and Payment Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Analyst IMS and Payment Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Analyst IMS is expected to generate 4.0 times less return on investment than Payment Financial. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Analyst IMS Investment is 5.41 times less risky than Payment Financial. It trades about 0.48 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Payment Financial Technologies is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  25,601  in Payment Financial Technologies on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,009  from holding Payment Financial Technologies or generate 35.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Analyst IMS Investment  vs.  Payment Financial Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Analyst IMS Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

23 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Analyst IMS Investment are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Analyst IMS sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Payment Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Payment Financial Technologies are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Payment Financial sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Analyst IMS and Payment Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Analyst IMS and Payment Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Analyst IMS and Payment Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Analyst IMS position performs unexpectedly, Payment Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Payment Financial will offset losses from the drop in Payment Financial's long position.
The idea behind Analyst IMS Investment and Payment Financial Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum