Correlation Between Bank of America and Ethereum Name

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Ethereum Name at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Ethereum Name into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Ethereum Name Service, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Ethereum Name and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Ethereum Name. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Ethereum Name.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Ethereum Name

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Ethereum is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Ethereum Name Service in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ethereum Name Service and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Ethereum Name. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ethereum Name Service has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Ethereum Name go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Ethereum Name

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 6.68 times less return on investment than Ethereum Name. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 6.11 times less risky than Ethereum Name. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ethereum Name Service is currently generating about 0.31 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,680  in Ethereum Name Service on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,714  from holding Ethereum Name Service or generate 102.02% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Ethereum Name Service

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sluggish basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ethereum Name Service 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ethereum Name Service are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Ethereum Name exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Ethereum Name Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Ethereum Name

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Ethereum Name positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Ethereum Name can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ethereum Name will offset losses from the drop in Ethereum Name's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Ethereum Name Service pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets