Correlation Between Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Alpsred Rocks Listed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Alps/red Rocks. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Alps/red is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Alpsred Rocks Listed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Alpsred Rocks Listed and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Alps/red Rocks. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Alpsred Rocks Listed has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.87 times more return on investment than Alps/red Rocks. However, Bank of America is 1.87 times more volatile than Alpsred Rocks Listed. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Alpsred Rocks Listed is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,036  in Bank of America on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,668  from holding Bank of America or generate 54.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Alpsred Rocks Listed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Alpsred Rocks Listed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Alpsred Rocks Listed are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Alps/red Rocks may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Alps/red Rocks positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Alps/red Rocks can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Alps/red Rocks will offset losses from the drop in Alps/red Rocks' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Alpsred Rocks Listed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum