Correlation Between Bank of America and MGM Resorts

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and MGM Resorts at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and MGM Resorts into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and MGM Resorts International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and MGM Resorts and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of MGM Resorts. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and MGM Resorts.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and MGM Resorts

0.04
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and MGM is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and MGM Resorts International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MGM Resorts International and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with MGM Resorts. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MGM Resorts International has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and MGM Resorts go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and MGM Resorts

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 0.73 times more return on investment than MGM Resorts. However, Bank of America is 1.38 times less risky than MGM Resorts. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MGM Resorts International is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,231  in Bank of America on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  546.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 12.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  MGM Resorts International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sluggish basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
MGM Resorts International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MGM Resorts International are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, MGM Resorts is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and MGM Resorts Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and MGM Resorts

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and MGM Resorts positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, MGM Resorts can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MGM Resorts will offset losses from the drop in MGM Resorts' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and MGM Resorts International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges