Correlation Between Bank of America and Smiths Group

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Smiths Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Smiths Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Smiths Group plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Smiths Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Smiths Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Smiths Group.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Smiths Group

-0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Smiths is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Smiths Group plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Smiths Group plc and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Smiths Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Smiths Group plc has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Smiths Group go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Smiths Group

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.18 times more return on investment than Smiths Group. However, Bank of America is 1.18 times more volatile than Smiths Group plc. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Smiths Group plc is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,810  in Bank of America on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,941  from holding Bank of America or generate 69.07% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy97.89%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Smiths Group plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Smiths Group plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smiths Group plc are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smiths Group is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Bank of America and Smiths Group Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Smiths Group

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Smiths Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Smiths Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Smiths Group will offset losses from the drop in Smiths Group's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Smiths Group plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings