Correlation Between Bank of America and Spring Ventures

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Spring Ventures at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Spring Ventures into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Spring Ventures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Spring Ventures and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Spring Ventures. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Spring Ventures.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Spring Ventures

-0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Spring is -0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Spring Ventures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Ventures and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Spring Ventures. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Ventures has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Spring Ventures go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Spring Ventures

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.01 times less return on investment than Spring Ventures. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 2.76 times less risky than Spring Ventures. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Ventures is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  50,849  in Spring Ventures on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,941  from holding Spring Ventures or generate 15.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy75.53%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Spring Ventures

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Spring Ventures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Spring Ventures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Bank of America and Spring Ventures Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Spring Ventures

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Spring Ventures positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Spring Ventures can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Ventures will offset losses from the drop in Spring Ventures' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Spring Ventures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk