Correlation Between Bank of America and USCF Midstream

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and USCF Midstream at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and USCF Midstream into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and USCF Midstream Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and USCF Midstream and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of USCF Midstream. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and USCF Midstream.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and USCF Midstream

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and USCF is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and USCF Midstream Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on USCF Midstream Energy and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with USCF Midstream. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of USCF Midstream Energy has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and USCF Midstream go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and USCF Midstream

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.73 times more return on investment than USCF Midstream. However, Bank of America is 1.73 times more volatile than USCF Midstream Energy. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. USCF Midstream Energy is currently generating about 0.53 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,182  in Bank of America on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  569.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 13.61% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  USCF Midstream Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
USCF Midstream Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

26 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in USCF Midstream Energy are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak primary indicators, USCF Midstream demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and USCF Midstream Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and USCF Midstream

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and USCF Midstream positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, USCF Midstream can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in USCF Midstream will offset losses from the drop in USCF Midstream's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and USCF Midstream Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets