Correlation Between Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Unilever Pakistan. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Unilever is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Unilever Pakistan Foods and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Unilever Pakistan. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Unilever Pakistan Foods has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.74 times more return on investment than Unilever Pakistan. However, Bank of America is 1.74 times more volatile than Unilever Pakistan Foods. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Unilever Pakistan Foods is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,231  in Bank of America on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  546.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 12.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Unilever Pakistan Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sluggish basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Unilever Pakistan Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Unilever Pakistan Foods are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Unilever Pakistan sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Unilever Pakistan can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Unilever Pakistan will offset losses from the drop in Unilever Pakistan's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Unilever Pakistan Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios