Correlation Between Bank of America and VanEck CEF

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and VanEck CEF at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and VanEck CEF into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and VanEck CEF Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and VanEck CEF and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of VanEck CEF. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and VanEck CEF.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and VanEck CEF

-0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and VanEck is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and VanEck CEF Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on VanEck CEF Municipal and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with VanEck CEF. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of VanEck CEF Municipal has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and VanEck CEF go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and VanEck CEF

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 3.72 times more return on investment than VanEck CEF. However, Bank of America is 3.72 times more volatile than VanEck CEF Municipal. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. VanEck CEF Municipal is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,265  in Bank of America on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  435.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 10.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  VanEck CEF Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
VanEck CEF Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in VanEck CEF Municipal are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, VanEck CEF is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Bank of America and VanEck CEF Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and VanEck CEF

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and VanEck CEF positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, VanEck CEF can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in VanEck CEF will offset losses from the drop in VanEck CEF's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and VanEck CEF Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments