Correlation Between Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sterling Capital Short and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sterling Capital with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging

0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sterling and Mfs is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sterling Capital Short and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Sterling Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sterling Capital Short are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Sterling Capital i.e., Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Sterling Capital is expected to generate 1.82 times less return on investment than Mfs Emerging. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Sterling Capital Short is 2.4 times less risky than Mfs Emerging. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,048  in Mfs Emerging Markets on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  179.00  from holding Mfs Emerging Markets or generate 17.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sterling Capital Short  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sterling Capital Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sterling Capital Short are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Sterling Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sterling Capital and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sterling Capital position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Sterling Capital Short and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.