Correlation Between Blender Financial and Payment Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Blender Financial and Payment Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Blender Financial and Payment Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Blender Financial Technologies and Payment Financial Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Blender Financial and Payment Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Blender Financial with a short position of Payment Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Blender Financial and Payment Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Blender Financial and Payment Financial

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Blender and Payment is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Blender Financial Technologies and Payment Financial Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Payment Financial and Blender Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Blender Financial Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Payment Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Payment Financial has no effect on the direction of Blender Financial i.e., Blender Financial and Payment Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Blender Financial and Payment Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Blender Financial Technologies is expected to under-perform the Payment Financial. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Blender Financial Technologies is 1.76 times less risky than Payment Financial. The stock trades about -0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Payment Financial Technologies is currently generating about 0.32 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  25,980  in Payment Financial Technologies on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,150  from holding Payment Financial Technologies or generate 27.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Blender Financial Technologies  vs.  Payment Financial Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Blender Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Blender Financial Technologies has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
Payment Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Payment Financial Technologies are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain basic indicators, Payment Financial sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Blender Financial and Payment Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Blender Financial and Payment Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Blender Financial and Payment Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Blender Financial position performs unexpectedly, Payment Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Payment Financial will offset losses from the drop in Payment Financial's long position.
The idea behind Blender Financial Technologies and Payment Financial Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments