Correlation Between Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of GOLDMAN SACHS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS

0.55
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and GOLDMAN is 0.55. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with GOLDMAN SACHS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GOLDMAN SACHS CDR has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the GOLDMAN SACHS. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 1.55 times less risky than GOLDMAN SACHS. The stock trades about -0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The GOLDMAN SACHS CDR is currently generating about -0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,140  in GOLDMAN SACHS CDR on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (93.00) from holding GOLDMAN SACHS CDR or give up 2.96% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  GOLDMAN SACHS CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
GOLDMAN SACHS CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in GOLDMAN SACHS CDR are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, GOLDMAN SACHS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, GOLDMAN SACHS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GOLDMAN SACHS will offset losses from the drop in GOLDMAN SACHS's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments