Correlation Between Bosch and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bosch and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bosch and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bosch Limited and Procter Gamble Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bosch and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bosch with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bosch and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Bosch and Procter Gamble

0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bosch and Procter is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bosch Limited and Procter Gamble Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble Health and Bosch is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bosch Limited are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble Health has no effect on the direction of Bosch i.e., Bosch and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bosch and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bosch Limited is expected to generate 1.17 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Bosch is 1.17 times more volatile than Procter Gamble Health. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble Health is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,990,258  in Bosch Limited on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  506,362  from holding Bosch Limited or generate 16.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bosch Limited  vs.  Procter Gamble Health

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bosch Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bosch Limited are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady essential indicators, Bosch may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Procter Gamble Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Bosch and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bosch and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bosch and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bosch position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Bosch Limited and Procter Gamble Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like