Correlation Between Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP INC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Boyd Gaming with a short position of CITIGROUP. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP.
Diversification Opportunities for Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP
-0.74 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Boyd and CITIGROUP is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP INC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CITIGROUP INC and Boyd Gaming is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Boyd Gaming are associated (or correlated) with CITIGROUP. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CITIGROUP INC has no effect on the direction of Boyd Gaming i.e., Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Boyd Gaming is expected to generate 2.55 times more return on investment than CITIGROUP. However, Boyd Gaming is 2.55 times more volatile than CITIGROUP INC. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CITIGROUP INC is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,732 in Boyd Gaming on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 653.00 from holding Boyd Gaming or generate 9.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 99.73% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Boyd Gaming vs. CITIGROUP INC
Performance |
Timeline |
Boyd Gaming |
CITIGROUP INC |
Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP
The main advantage of trading using opposite Boyd Gaming and CITIGROUP positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Boyd Gaming position performs unexpectedly, CITIGROUP can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CITIGROUP will offset losses from the drop in CITIGROUP's long position.Boyd Gaming vs. MGM Resorts International | Boyd Gaming vs. Las Vegas Sands | Boyd Gaming vs. Wynn Resorts Limited | Boyd Gaming vs. Penn National Gaming |
CITIGROUP vs. AEP TEX INC | CITIGROUP vs. US BANK NATIONAL | CITIGROUP vs. American Express | CITIGROUP vs. Chevron Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |