Correlation Between Citigroup and Ainsworth Game

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Ainsworth Game at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Ainsworth Game into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Ainsworth Game Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Ainsworth Game and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Ainsworth Game. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Ainsworth Game.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Ainsworth Game

-0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Ainsworth is -0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Ainsworth Game Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ainsworth Game Technology and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Ainsworth Game. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ainsworth Game Technology has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Ainsworth Game go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Ainsworth Game

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.18 times more return on investment than Ainsworth Game. However, Citigroup is 1.18 times more volatile than Ainsworth Game Technology. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ainsworth Game Technology is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,393  in Citigroup on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  623.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 9.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Ainsworth Game Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ainsworth Game Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ainsworth Game Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Citigroup and Ainsworth Game Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Ainsworth Game

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Ainsworth Game positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Ainsworth Game can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ainsworth Game will offset losses from the drop in Ainsworth Game's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Ainsworth Game Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device