Correlation Between Citigroup and Heartbeam

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Heartbeam at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Heartbeam into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Heartbeam, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Heartbeam and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Heartbeam. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Heartbeam.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Heartbeam

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Heartbeam is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Heartbeam in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Heartbeam and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Heartbeam. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Heartbeam has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Heartbeam go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Heartbeam

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 2.31 times less return on investment than Heartbeam. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 2.39 times less risky than Heartbeam. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Heartbeam is currently generating about 0.25 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  242.00  in Heartbeam on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  64.00  from holding Heartbeam or generate 26.45% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Heartbeam

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Heartbeam 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Heartbeam are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, Heartbeam unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Heartbeam Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Heartbeam

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Heartbeam positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Heartbeam can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Heartbeam will offset losses from the drop in Heartbeam's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Heartbeam pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume