Correlation Between Citigroup and Glen Burnie

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Glen Burnie at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Glen Burnie into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Glen Burnie Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Glen Burnie and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Glen Burnie. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Glen Burnie.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Glen Burnie

0.26
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Glen is 0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Glen Burnie Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Glen Burnie Bancorp and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Glen Burnie. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Glen Burnie Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Glen Burnie go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Glen Burnie

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 60.75 times less return on investment than Glen Burnie. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Citigroup is 46.68 times less risky than Glen Burnie. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Glen Burnie Bancorp is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  430.00  in Glen Burnie Bancorp on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  130.00  from holding Glen Burnie Bancorp or generate 30.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Glen Burnie Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Glen Burnie Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glen Burnie Bancorp are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly uncertain fundamental drivers, Glen Burnie showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Citigroup and Glen Burnie Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Glen Burnie

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Glen Burnie positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Glen Burnie can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Glen Burnie will offset losses from the drop in Glen Burnie's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Glen Burnie Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance