Correlation Between Citigroup and GRS
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and GRS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and GRS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and GRS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and GRS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of GRS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and GRS.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and GRS
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and GRS is -0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and GRS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GRS and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with GRS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GRS has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and GRS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and GRS
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.33 times more return on investment than GRS. However, Citigroup is 3.0 times less risky than GRS. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GRS is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest 8,051 in Citigroup on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (144.00) from holding Citigroup or give up 1.79% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. GRS
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
GRS |
Citigroup and GRS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and GRS
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and GRS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, GRS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GRS will offset losses from the drop in GRS's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets |