Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and Clean Energy Fuels, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of Clean Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy.
Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy
0.13 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and Clean is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and Clean Energy Fuels in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clean Energy Fuels and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Clean Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clean Energy Fuels has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy
Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.73 times more return on investment than Clean Energy. However, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 1.38 times less risky than Clean Energy. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clean Energy Fuels is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 350.00 in Consolidated Communications Holdings on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 94.00 from holding Consolidated Communications Holdings or generate 26.86% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Consolidated Communications Ho vs. Clean Energy Fuels
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Consolidated Communications |
| Clean Energy Fuels |
Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and Clean Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, Clean Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clean Energy will offset losses from the drop in Clean Energy's long position.The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and Clean Energy Fuels pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Clean Energy vs. NISSAN CHEMICAL IND | Clean Energy vs. PRECISION DRILLING P | Clean Energy vs. Consolidated Communications Holdings | Clean Energy vs. Nissan Chemical Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets |