Correlation Between Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Balanced Fund and Loomis Sayles Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Balanced with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Loomis is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Balanced Fund and Loomis Sayles Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Global and Columbia Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Balanced Fund are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Global has no effect on the direction of Columbia Balanced i.e., Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Balanced is expected to generate 1.01 times less return on investment than Loomis Sayles. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Columbia Balanced Fund is 1.23 times less risky than Loomis Sayles. It trades about 0.41 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Loomis Sayles Global is currently generating about 0.33 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,624  in Loomis Sayles Global on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  105.00  from holding Loomis Sayles Global or generate 4.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Balanced Fund  vs.  Loomis Sayles Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Balanced Fund are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Loomis Sayles Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Loomis Sayles Global are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Balanced and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind Columbia Balanced Fund and Loomis Sayles Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk