Correlation Between Challenger and Fisher Paykel

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Challenger and Fisher Paykel at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Challenger and Fisher Paykel into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Challenger and Fisher Paykel Healthcare, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Challenger and Fisher Paykel and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Challenger with a short position of Fisher Paykel. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Challenger and Fisher Paykel.

Diversification Opportunities for Challenger and Fisher Paykel

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Challenger and Fisher is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Challenger and Fisher Paykel Healthcare in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisher Paykel Healthcare and Challenger is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Challenger are associated (or correlated) with Fisher Paykel. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisher Paykel Healthcare has no effect on the direction of Challenger i.e., Challenger and Fisher Paykel go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Challenger and Fisher Paykel

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Challenger is expected to generate 4.01 times less return on investment than Fisher Paykel. In addition to that, Challenger is 1.02 times more volatile than Fisher Paykel Healthcare. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fisher Paykel Healthcare is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,124  in Fisher Paykel Healthcare on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,328  from holding Fisher Paykel Healthcare or generate 62.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Challenger  vs.  Fisher Paykel Healthcare

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Challenger 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Challenger has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Fisher Paykel Healthcare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fisher Paykel Healthcare are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Fisher Paykel is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Challenger and Fisher Paykel Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Challenger and Fisher Paykel

The main advantage of trading using opposite Challenger and Fisher Paykel positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Challenger position performs unexpectedly, Fisher Paykel can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisher Paykel will offset losses from the drop in Fisher Paykel's long position.
The idea behind Challenger and Fisher Paykel Healthcare pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity