Correlation Between CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CK Infrastructure Holdings and CMS Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CK Infrastructure with a short position of CMS Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between CHH and CMS is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CK Infrastructure Holdings and CMS Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CMS Energy and CK Infrastructure is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CK Infrastructure Holdings are associated (or correlated) with CMS Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CMS Energy has no effect on the direction of CK Infrastructure i.e., CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon CK Infrastructure Holdings is expected to under-perform the CMS Energy. In addition to that, CK Infrastructure is 2.04 times more volatile than CMS Energy. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. CMS Energy is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  6,349  in CMS Energy on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  51.00  from holding CMS Energy or generate 0.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

CK Infrastructure Holdings  vs.  CMS Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
CK Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days CK Infrastructure Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, CK Infrastructure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
CMS Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CMS Energy are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, CMS Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite CK Infrastructure and CMS Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CK Infrastructure position performs unexpectedly, CMS Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CMS Energy will offset losses from the drop in CMS Energy's long position.
The idea behind CK Infrastructure Holdings and CMS Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world