Correlation Between Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chestnut Street Exchange and Institutional Fiduciary Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chestnut Street with a short position of Institutional Fiduciary. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary.

Diversification Opportunities for Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary

0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chestnut and Institutional is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chestnut Street Exchange and Institutional Fiduciary Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Institutional Fiduciary and Chestnut Street is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chestnut Street Exchange are associated (or correlated) with Institutional Fiduciary. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Institutional Fiduciary has no effect on the direction of Chestnut Street i.e., Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chestnut Street Exchange is expected to generate 5.27 times more return on investment than Institutional Fiduciary. However, Chestnut Street is 5.27 times more volatile than Institutional Fiduciary Trust. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Institutional Fiduciary Trust is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  109,535  in Chestnut Street Exchange on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,179  from holding Chestnut Street Exchange or generate 6.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chestnut Street Exchange  vs.  Institutional Fiduciary Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chestnut Street Exchange 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chestnut Street Exchange are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Chestnut Street may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Institutional Fiduciary 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Institutional Fiduciary Trust are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Institutional Fiduciary is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chestnut Street and Institutional Fiduciary positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chestnut Street position performs unexpectedly, Institutional Fiduciary can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Institutional Fiduciary will offset losses from the drop in Institutional Fiduciary's long position.
The idea behind Chestnut Street Exchange and Institutional Fiduciary Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume